Enhanced solidification in latent heat storage systems using fins and twisted tapes

• Fin and tape configurations accelerate the solidification process. • Fin designs outperform tape configurations for boosting solidification. • Vertical fins reduced solidification time by 28.5% compared to the base case. • Twisted tapes boost solidification by 5.8% via induced swirl flow. • Twisted tapes add a 32–37% further pressure drop versus straight tapes. Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage (LHTES) systems are limited by the low thermal conductivity of Phase Change Materials (PCMs), which restricts heat transfer during charging and discharging. This study numerically explores geometric improvements to enhance solidification in shell-and-tube LHTES units. Eight configurations incorporating fins and twisted-tape inserts were analysed using a transient 3D enthalpy-porosity model in ANSYS Fluent, with stearic acid as the PCM and water as the Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF). Pressure drop analysis revealed that the introduction of inserts increased hydraulic resistance. Straight tape inserts produced the most pronounced penalty, increasing pressure drop by 186–280% relative to the baseline. Twisted tape inserts introduced an additional 32–37% resistance beyond that of straight tapes. Fin-based configurations did not exhibit any hydraulic penalty. Regarding thermal performance, vertical fins provided the greatest improvement, reducing solidification time by 28.5% compared to the baseline. Helical fins performed particularly well within the time range (0–49 min) due to a higher surface-area-to-volume ratio, while horizontal fins showed limited enhancement. The hybrid helical-fin-twisted-tape configuration achieved optimal performance within the time range (0–47 min), reducing solidification time by 17.8% compared with the base case through combined conductive and convective enhancement. Twisted tapes improved solidification by 5.8% via induced swirl flow. These findings provide essential guidelines for designing LHTES systems for renewable energy and waste heat recovery, balancing thermal efficiency and hydraulic performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2026.104718
Primary Topic
Phase Change Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced solidification in latent heat storage systems using fins and twisted tapes

Aldo Rona, Audrius Bagdanavičius, Sally Shahzad, Abdullah Masoud Ali
Thermal Science and Engineering Progress
Phase Change Materials Research
article

Enhanced solidification in latent heat storage systems using fins and twisted tapes

Aldo Rona, Audrius Bagdanavičius, Sally Shahzad, Abdullah Masoud Ali
article en

Abstract

• Fin and tape configurations accelerate the solidification process. • Fin designs outperform tape configurations for boosting solidification. • Vertical fins reduced solidification time by 28.5% compared to the base case. • Twisted tapes boost solidification by 5.8% via induced swirl flow. • Twisted tapes add a 32–37% further pressure drop versus straight tapes. Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage (LHTES) systems are limited by the low thermal conductivity of Phase Change Materials (PCMs), which restricts heat transfer during charging and discharging. This study numerically explores geometric improvements to enhance solidification in shell-and-tube LHTES units. Eight configurations incorporating fins and twisted-tape inserts were analysed using a transient 3D enthalpy-porosity model in ANSYS Fluent, with stearic acid as the PCM and water as the Heat Transfer Fluid (HTF). Pressure drop analysis revealed that the introduction of inserts increased hydraulic resistance. Straight tape inserts produced the most pronounced penalty, increasing pressure drop by 186–280% relative to the baseline. Twisted tape inserts introduced an additional 32–37% resistance beyond that of straight tapes. Fin-based configurations did not exhibit any hydraulic penalty. Regarding thermal performance, vertical fins provided the greatest improvement, reducing solidification time by 28.5% compared to the baseline. Helical fins performed particularly well within the time range (0–49 min) due to a higher surface-area-to-volume ratio, while horizontal fins showed limited enhancement. The hybrid helical-fin-twisted-tape configuration achieved optimal performance within the time range (0–47 min), reducing solidification time by 17.8% compared with the base case through combined conductive and convective enhancement. Twisted tapes improved solidification by 5.8% via induced swirl flow. These findings provide essential guidelines for designing LHTES systems for renewable energy and waste heat recovery, balancing thermal efficiency and hydraulic performance.

Thermal Science and Engineering ProgressVol. 74
University of Leeds (GB), University of Leicester (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Phase Change Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.