External Threats and Support for Military Service under Authoritarian Rule

As international conflicts escalate, states are increasingly turning to conscription and broader public participation in national defense. This article examines how acute external threats influence public attitudes toward military service. Leveraging original survey data from Iran, fielded before and after the unprecedented April 13, 2024 missile exchange with Israel, I use matching techniques to compare responses across the two periods. Individuals surveyed after the attack were significantly more likely to support mandatory male conscription and to support women’s military service. Importantly, support rose even though conscription is widely unpopular in peacetime and despite Iran’s gender hierarchies. These findings demonstrate that external threats can legitimize coercion in contexts of regime distrust and reconfigure gender boundaries around military participation. The study contributes to research on public perceptions of war, coercion, and militarization by highlighting how geopolitical shocks recalibrate the boundaries of both state authority and gendered citizenship.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Politics
Published
2026-10-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/744325
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

External Threats and Support for Military Service under Authoritarian Rule

Roya Izadi
The Journal of Politics
Political Conflict and Governance
article

External Threats and Support for Military Service under Authoritarian Rule

Roya Izadi
article en

Abstract

As international conflicts escalate, states are increasingly turning to conscription and broader public participation in national defense. This article examines how acute external threats influence public attitudes toward military service. Leveraging original survey data from Iran, fielded before and after the unprecedented April 13, 2024 missile exchange with Israel, I use matching techniques to compare responses across the two periods. Individuals surveyed after the attack were significantly more likely to support mandatory male conscription and to support women’s military service. Importantly, support rose even though conscription is widely unpopular in peacetime and despite Iran’s gender hierarchies. These findings demonstrate that external threats can legitimize coercion in contexts of regime distrust and reconfigure gender boundaries around military participation. The study contributes to research on public perceptions of war, coercion, and militarization by highlighting how geopolitical shocks recalibrate the boundaries of both state authority and gendered citizenship.

The Journal of Politics
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

External Threats and Support for Military Service under Authoritarian Rule — Roya Izadi · The Journal of Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS