Tongue swab Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing for TB using a revised consensus protocol

<sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>Tongue swabs are a promising specimen type for TB diagnosis. In a previous study, using a consensus protocol, tongue swabs tested with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra outperformed sputum smear microscopy, but a substantial proportion (6.1%) of results were non-actionable (e.g., invalid/error). We evaluated a revised protocol for tongue swab Xpert Ultra testing in four high-burden countries.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>Participants aged ≥12 years with presumptive TB were enrolled from outpatient clinics in the Philippines, South Africa, Nigeria, and Zambia. Tongue swabs were processed using Sample Reagent (SR, Cepheid, USA) diluted 2:1 with phosphate buffer or phosphate-buffered saline and tested with Xpert Ultra. Diagnostic performance was assessed against culture-based microbiological reference standard and compared to sputum tests.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>From March to November 2024, 1,168 participants were enrolled (median age 37 [IQR: 28-48] years; 46.7% female; 21.8% living with HIV; 18.5% culture-confirmed TB). The proportion of non-actionable tongue swab results was 5.6% overall, but <4% in all countries except South Africa (15.4%). Tongue swab sensitivity was 66.0% (95% CI: 59.0-72.5); specificity was 99.6% (95% CI: 98.9-99.9).</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title>The revised protocol yielded low error rates at most sites and moderate sensitivity, supporting tongue swabs as an alternative specimen for Xpert Ultra testing when sputum is unavailable.</sec>.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.25.0520
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tongue swab Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing for TB using a revised consensus protocol

C.M. Denkinger, J S Bimba, M. Muyoyeta, B. Tasca et al.
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
article

Tongue swab Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra testing for TB using a revised consensus protocol

C.M. Denkinger, J S Bimba, M. Muyoyeta, B. Tasca, M. Chirwa, A. Cattamanchi, P. Nahid, M. Kato-Maeda, C. Yu, M. de Vos, C.A. Moe, G. Theron, L. Rockman, B. Ajide, P. de Haas, K. Kremer, J. Barrameda
article en

Abstract

<sec><title>BACKGROUND</title>Tongue swabs are a promising specimen type for TB diagnosis. In a previous study, using a consensus protocol, tongue swabs tested with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra outperformed sputum smear microscopy, but a substantial proportion (6.1%) of results were non-actionable (e.g., invalid/error). We evaluated a revised protocol for tongue swab Xpert Ultra testing in four high-burden countries.</sec><sec><title>METHODS</title>Participants aged ≥12 years with presumptive TB were enrolled from outpatient clinics in the Philippines, South Africa, Nigeria, and Zambia. Tongue swabs were processed using Sample Reagent (SR, Cepheid, USA) diluted 2:1 with phosphate buffer or phosphate-buffered saline and tested with Xpert Ultra. Diagnostic performance was assessed against culture-based microbiological reference standard and compared to sputum tests.</sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title>From March to November 2024, 1,168 participants were enrolled (median age 37 [IQR: 28-48] years; 46.7% female; 21.8% living with HIV; 18.5% culture-confirmed TB). The proportion of non-actionable tongue swab results was 5.6% overall, but <4% in all countries except South Africa (15.4%). Tongue swab sensitivity was 66.0% (95% CI: 59.0-72.5); specificity was 99.6% (95% CI: 98.9-99.9).</sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title>The revised protocol yielded low error rates at most sites and moderate sensitivity, supporting tongue swabs as an alternative specimen for Xpert Ultra testing when sputum is unavailable.</sec>.

The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung DiseaseVol. 30(5)
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM), University of California, San Francisco (US), Bingham University (NG), Heidelberg University (DE), TuBerculosis Vaccine Initiative (NL), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University of California, Irvine Medical Center (US), German Center for Infection Research (DE), Global Brain Health Institute (US), University of San Francisco (US), De La Salle University – Dasmariñas (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.