Deprescribing decisions in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis of multi-stakeholder experiences and influencing factors

Deprescribing decisions in palliative care involve complex interactions among multiple stakeholders, yet the experiences and needs of those involved remain poorly understood and lack systematic integration. This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experience, needs and influencing factors of multi-stakeholder in deprescribing decisions within palliative care, and to identify the core challenges faced in clinical practice. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched from inception to November 8, 2025. The search strategy combined terms related to deprescribing, palliative care, and qualitative research. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts against predefined inclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for qualitative research, and data were synthesized using thematic integration. The review followed ENTREQ guidelines for reporting. Eight studies from four countries were included, exploring deprescribing experiences and needs of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Thematic synthesis generated four overarching themes: complexity of decision-making, role variations among multiple-stakeholders, Communication strategies and trust-building, healthcare system and environment barriers. Effective communication among multiple-stakeholders is critical for addressing deprescribing challenges in palliative care. The differences in stakeholders' priorities and the barriers between the healthcare system and the environment are common challenges that need to be faced. These experiences and demands affect the appropriateness and feasibility of deprescribing decisions, and have a significant impact on optimizing deprescribing practices in palliative care, improving the quality of life and care delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Palliative Care
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02111-2
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deprescribing decisions in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis of multi-stakeholder experiences and influencing factors

Z Wang, Yu Zhang, Lei Gang, Qiaoyan Wu et al.
BMC Palliative Care
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Deprescribing decisions in palliative care: a qualitative meta-synthesis of multi-stakeholder experiences and influencing factors

Z Wang, Yu Zhang, Lei Gang, Qiaoyan Wu, Yunjian Qu, Li Chen
article en

Abstract

Deprescribing decisions in palliative care involve complex interactions among multiple stakeholders, yet the experiences and needs of those involved remain poorly understood and lack systematic integration. This review aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on the experience, needs and influencing factors of multi-stakeholder in deprescribing decisions within palliative care, and to identify the core challenges faced in clinical practice. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Six electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang) were searched from inception to November 8, 2025. The search strategy combined terms related to deprescribing, palliative care, and qualitative research. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts against predefined inclusion criteria. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for qualitative research, and data were synthesized using thematic integration. The review followed ENTREQ guidelines for reporting. Eight studies from four countries were included, exploring deprescribing experiences and needs of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals. Thematic synthesis generated four overarching themes: complexity of decision-making, role variations among multiple-stakeholders, Communication strategies and trust-building, healthcare system and environment barriers. Effective communication among multiple-stakeholders is critical for addressing deprescribing challenges in palliative care. The differences in stakeholders' priorities and the barriers between the healthcare system and the environment are common challenges that need to be faced. These experiences and demands affect the appropriateness and feasibility of deprescribing decisions, and have a significant impact on optimizing deprescribing practices in palliative care, improving the quality of life and care delivery.

BMC Palliative Care
Hengyang Normal University (CN), Hunan Normal University (CN), Huzhou Normal University (CN), University of South China (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.