Transgression of Planetary Boundaries: Are Multinational Firms Addressing the Emergent Risks?

The debate around corporate sustainability has become increasingly heated, with opinions ranging from denial of climate change to fatalistic acceptance of an impending collapse of civilization. This study examines how multinational enterprises, which contribute to nearly half of global GDP, internalize knowledge of planetary boundaries and take action within the organization or externally with investors, industry bodies, and policymakers. The research is grounded in empirical analysis of longitudinal data on two large samples of multinationals. It is found that, despite warnings from scientists about breaching planetary boundaries, multinationals, at best, follow an incremental approach to sustainability initiatives that collectively fail to drive positive global change. This well-entrenched practice remains unquestioned by external stakeholders, such as regulators, investors, and lenders. The research explains this behavior through (a) our inability to link global scientific findings to non-financial performance imperatives for individual businesses, and (b) our reliance on traditional enterprise risk management models that are less effective in a non-ergodic world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19050316
Primary Topic
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transgression of Planetary Boundaries: Are Multinational Firms Addressing the Emergent Risks?

Arindam Das
Journal of risk and financial management
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
article

Transgression of Planetary Boundaries: Are Multinational Firms Addressing the Emergent Risks?

Arindam Das
article en

Abstract

The debate around corporate sustainability has become increasingly heated, with opinions ranging from denial of climate change to fatalistic acceptance of an impending collapse of civilization. This study examines how multinational enterprises, which contribute to nearly half of global GDP, internalize knowledge of planetary boundaries and take action within the organization or externally with investors, industry bodies, and policymakers. The research is grounded in empirical analysis of longitudinal data on two large samples of multinationals. It is found that, despite warnings from scientists about breaching planetary boundaries, multinationals, at best, follow an incremental approach to sustainability initiatives that collectively fail to drive positive global change. This well-entrenched practice remains unquestioned by external stakeholders, such as regulators, investors, and lenders. The research explains this behavior through (a) our inability to link global scientific findings to non-financial performance imperatives for individual businesses, and (b) our reliance on traditional enterprise risk management models that are less effective in a non-ergodic world.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(5)
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.