Volumetric phase-specific three-dimensional radiomics and machine learning for differentiation of non-mass enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE: ) post-contrast phases to differentiate benign from malignant NMEs. METHODS: A total of 110 NMEs (86 benign and 24 malignant) from 108 patients were analyzed. Radiological features were recorded. Radiomics features were extracted from manual 3D segmentations using LIFEx software. Multivariate logistic regression (LR) and supervised ML algorithms-LR, support vector machine, random forest, and gradient boosting-were applied. The methodological quality was assessed using the Multicenter Evaluation of Radiomics in Clinical Studies framework. RESULTS: < 0.05). In the early phase, combining all radiomics features increased specificity from 78% to 98% and accuracy from 82% to 93%. ML models further improved performance, achieving specificity up to 99% and area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.91. Similar improvements were observed on the late phase, with accuracies up to 91% and AUC values up to 0.93. CONCLUSION: Volumetric 3D radiomics, combined with ML, using early and late post-contrast phases improves diagnostic accuracy and specificity for NME on breast MRI. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Integrating 3D radiomics and ML into breast MRI evaluation supports more accurate decision-making in NME and may reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2026.263899
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Volumetric phase-specific three-dimensional radiomics and machine learning for differentiation of non-mass enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging

Merih Güray Durak, Melike Zeynep Akış, Serhat Akış, Ali İbrahim Sevinç et al.
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Volumetric phase-specific three-dimensional radiomics and machine learning for differentiation of non-mass enhancement in breast magnetic resonance imaging

Merih Güray Durak, Melike Zeynep Akış, Serhat Akış, Ali İbrahim Sevinç, Süleyman Aksoy, Muhammet Baldan, Pınar Balcı, Işıl Başara Akın
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: ) post-contrast phases to differentiate benign from malignant NMEs. METHODS: A total of 110 NMEs (86 benign and 24 malignant) from 108 patients were analyzed. Radiological features were recorded. Radiomics features were extracted from manual 3D segmentations using LIFEx software. Multivariate logistic regression (LR) and supervised ML algorithms-LR, support vector machine, random forest, and gradient boosting-were applied. The methodological quality was assessed using the Multicenter Evaluation of Radiomics in Clinical Studies framework. RESULTS: < 0.05). In the early phase, combining all radiomics features increased specificity from 78% to 98% and accuracy from 82% to 93%. ML models further improved performance, achieving specificity up to 99% and area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.91. Similar improvements were observed on the late phase, with accuracies up to 91% and AUC values up to 0.93. CONCLUSION: Volumetric 3D radiomics, combined with ML, using early and late post-contrast phases improves diagnostic accuracy and specificity for NME on breast MRI. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Integrating 3D radiomics and ML into breast MRI evaluation supports more accurate decision-making in NME and may reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Izmir University (TR), Istanbul Aydın University (TR), Dokuz Eylül University (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Izmir Tepecik Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.