Face aging rate quantifies change in biological age to predict cancer outcomes

Chronological age predicts cancer survival but does not capture differences in biological aging rates. We apply FaceAge, an artificial intelligence algorithm that predicts biological age from a facial photograph, to serial clinical facial photographs to calculate the Face Aging Rate (FAR; change in FaceAge divided by the time between photographs). We analyze data from 2276 cancer patients receiving radiation therapy, using photographs captured during routine care. Higher FAR is associated with worse overall survival in stratified analyses of cohorts with the following intervals between photographs: short 10-365 days (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] and 95% confidence interval: 1.25 [1.03-1.51]), mid 366-730 days (aHR: 1.37 [1.00-1.86]), and long 731-1,460 days (aHR: 1.65 [1.22-2.22]) after adjustment for time between photographs, sex, race, and diagnosis. FAR provides additional prognostic information beyond single time-point measures of FaceAge. FAR is a non-invasive prognostic biomarker that captures dynamic changes in biological aging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66758-w
Primary Topic
Face recognition and analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Face aging rate quantifies change in biological age to predict cancer outcomes

Dennis Bontempi, G Lee, Andrew Warrington, Paul J. Catalano et al.
Nature Communications
Face recognition and analysis
article

Face aging rate quantifies change in biological age to predict cancer outcomes

Dennis Bontempi, G Lee, Andrew Warrington, Paul J. Catalano, Fridolin Haugg, Suraj Pai, Vasco Prudente, Hugo JWL Aerts, Raymond H. Mak, Danielle S. Bitterman, Benjamin H. Kann, Christian Guthier, John He
article en

Abstract

Chronological age predicts cancer survival but does not capture differences in biological aging rates. We apply FaceAge, an artificial intelligence algorithm that predicts biological age from a facial photograph, to serial clinical facial photographs to calculate the Face Aging Rate (FAR; change in FaceAge divided by the time between photographs). We analyze data from 2276 cancer patients receiving radiation therapy, using photographs captured during routine care. Higher FAR is associated with worse overall survival in stratified analyses of cohorts with the following intervals between photographs: short 10-365 days (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] and 95% confidence interval: 1.25 [1.03-1.51]), mid 366-730 days (aHR: 1.37 [1.00-1.86]), and long 731-1,460 days (aHR: 1.65 [1.22-2.22]) after adjustment for time between photographs, sex, race, and diagnosis. FAR provides additional prognostic information beyond single time-point measures of FaceAge. FAR is a non-invasive prognostic biomarker that captures dynamic changes in biological aging.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Maastricht University (NL), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Maastro Clinic (NL), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Mass General Brigham (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Face recognition and analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Face aging rate quantifies change in biological age to predict cancer outcomes — Dennis Bontempi, G Lee, et al. · Nature Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS