How AI shapes student agency and educational stratification: a qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis

Existing research on artificial intelligence in education has largely addressed technical applications and learning outcomes while leaving sociological dimensions of AI-mediated stratification and student agency inadequately theorised. Drawing on Bourdieu's cultural capital framework, digital divide scholarship, and Yosso's Community Cultural Wealth model, this qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis examines how AI-mediated learning environments interact with established stratification mechanisms and transform student agency. Systematic searches across Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ERIC identified five qualitative and mixed-methods studies encompassing 3,849 students across the United States, Norway, Israel, and China; thematic analysis followed Braun and Clarke's framework with four-analyst triangulation. Five mechanisms emerged through which AI technologies simultaneously reproduce traditional educational inequalities while generating alternative stratification forms: cultural capital mobilization through resistant, communal, and creative capital; differential engagement patterns across four distinct agency expressions; digital divide persistence and evolution; trust calibration in human-AI interaction; and educational equity implications with career dimensions. Students from underserved communities demonstrated sophisticated algorithmic bias recognition, yet gender-differentiated engagement patterns and socioeconomic disparities indicate emergent stratification with professional consequences. Lower AI trust paradoxically correlated with stronger educational outcomes, tentatively suggesting that healthy skepticism promotes more agentic learning relationships. These findings indicate that AI-mediated stratification operates through qualitative differences in how students position themselves relative to algorithmic systems and mobilize cultural resources, rather than through differential access alone, with implications for how educational institutions conceptualise equity-oriented AI integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Human Dynamics
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2026.1787728
Primary Topic
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How AI shapes student agency and educational stratification: a qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis

G Boccuzzi, Flavio Manganello, Alberto Nico, Giancarlo Masi
Frontiers in Human Dynamics
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
article

How AI shapes student agency and educational stratification: a qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis

G Boccuzzi, Flavio Manganello, Alberto Nico, Giancarlo Masi
article en

Abstract

Existing research on artificial intelligence in education has largely addressed technical applications and learning outcomes while leaving sociological dimensions of AI-mediated stratification and student agency inadequately theorised. Drawing on Bourdieu's cultural capital framework, digital divide scholarship, and Yosso's Community Cultural Wealth model, this qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis examines how AI-mediated learning environments interact with established stratification mechanisms and transform student agency. Systematic searches across Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and ERIC identified five qualitative and mixed-methods studies encompassing 3,849 students across the United States, Norway, Israel, and China; thematic analysis followed Braun and Clarke's framework with four-analyst triangulation. Five mechanisms emerged through which AI technologies simultaneously reproduce traditional educational inequalities while generating alternative stratification forms: cultural capital mobilization through resistant, communal, and creative capital; differential engagement patterns across four distinct agency expressions; digital divide persistence and evolution; trust calibration in human-AI interaction; and educational equity implications with career dimensions. Students from underserved communities demonstrated sophisticated algorithmic bias recognition, yet gender-differentiated engagement patterns and socioeconomic disparities indicate emergent stratification with professional consequences. Lower AI trust paradoxically correlated with stronger educational outcomes, tentatively suggesting that healthy skepticism promotes more agentic learning relationships. These findings indicate that AI-mediated stratification operates through qualitative differences in how students position themselves relative to algorithmic systems and mobilize cultural resources, rather than through differential access alone, with implications for how educational institutions conceptualise equity-oriented AI integration.

Frontiers in Human DynamicsVol. 8
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT), Morpho (United States) (US), National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (US), National Institute for Education (SK), National Research Council (RO), University of Bologna (IT)
Gender equality, Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Impact of Technology on Adolescents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.