Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow

Computational fluid dynamics simulations are increasingly being integrated into clinical medicine, where they have the potential to support clinicians in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, these models frequently use deterministic approaches, neglecting inherent variability (or uncertainty) in input parameters, thereby undermining model credibility and limiting clinical adoption. Herein, we integrate modern and certifiable uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques to characterize and quantify the variability in coronary artery wall shear stress (WSS) under steady flow conditions due to intrinsic uncertainty in model-dependent quantities. Univariate probability distributions were fit to hemodynamic parameters (density, pressure, radius, velocity, viscosity), and sampled parameter ensembles were applied to an analytical solution (Poiseuille flow) and a patient-specific coronary artery model. Results from the analytical solution demonstrated that variability in input parameters propagated to uncertainty in WSS values, with uncertainty in velocity accounting for the majority (~79%) of WSS variability. In the patient-specific model, spatial medians in WSS varied by ~50% due to input parameter uncertainties, with viscosity (~59%) and velocity (~40%) emerging as the dominant contributors to WSS variability. Across each use case unary interactions dominated (i.e., first-order Sobol indices accounted for the majority of the variance), contributing to ~93% and ~99% of the total WSS variance in the analytical and patient-specific model, respectively. Collectively, this study establishes an uncertainty-aware framework to strengthen computational biomechanics model credibility, aligning with emerging regulatory guidance and enabling more trustworthy modeling-based decision support in the management of coronary artery disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071773
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow

Lucas H. Timmins, Akil Narayan, Peter Castillo, Muhammad Usman
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Integrating Uncertainty Quantification into Computational Fluid Dynamics Models of Coronary Arteries Under Steady Flow

Lucas H. Timmins, Akil Narayan, Peter Castillo, Muhammad Usman
article en

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics simulations are increasingly being integrated into clinical medicine, where they have the potential to support clinicians in disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, these models frequently use deterministic approaches, neglecting inherent variability (or uncertainty) in input parameters, thereby undermining model credibility and limiting clinical adoption. Herein, we integrate modern and certifiable uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques to characterize and quantify the variability in coronary artery wall shear stress (WSS) under steady flow conditions due to intrinsic uncertainty in model-dependent quantities. Univariate probability distributions were fit to hemodynamic parameters (density, pressure, radius, velocity, viscosity), and sampled parameter ensembles were applied to an analytical solution (Poiseuille flow) and a patient-specific coronary artery model. Results from the analytical solution demonstrated that variability in input parameters propagated to uncertainty in WSS values, with uncertainty in velocity accounting for the majority (~79%) of WSS variability. In the patient-specific model, spatial medians in WSS varied by ~50% due to input parameter uncertainties, with viscosity (~59%) and velocity (~40%) emerging as the dominant contributors to WSS variability. Across each use case unary interactions dominated (i.e., first-order Sobol indices accounted for the majority of the variance), contributing to ~93% and ~99% of the total WSS variance in the analytical and patient-specific model, respectively. Collectively, this study establishes an uncertainty-aware framework to strengthen computational biomechanics model credibility, aligning with emerging regulatory guidance and enabling more trustworthy modeling-based decision support in the management of coronary artery disease.

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Holyoke Community College (US), University of Utah (US), Texas A&M University (US)
National Institutes of Health, High Performance Research Computing, Texas A and M University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.