Comparing Clinical Profiles, Symptom Burden, Care Delivery, and Outcomes Between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Patients in a Public Home-Based Palliative Care Program

= 0.0021). Overall, 99.6% of patients died at home.ConclusionsPublicly funded HBPC can support a high intensity of medical and nursing care and enable successful home death for both oncological and non-oncological patients, even in socioeconomically vulnerable populations. While symptom profiles and care needs differ by diagnosis, functional status remains a key determinant of outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of PPS-guided care planning and workforce capacity to deliver equitable, scalable palliative care across disease groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091261444925
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Clinical Profiles, Symptom Burden, Care Delivery, and Outcomes Between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Patients in a Public Home-Based Palliative Care Program

Mônica Isaura Corrêa, Igor de Oliveira Claber Siqueira, Ana Paula Drummond‐Lage, Sonia Souza et al.
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
article

Comparing Clinical Profiles, Symptom Burden, Care Delivery, and Outcomes Between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Patients in a Public Home-Based Palliative Care Program

Mônica Isaura Corrêa, Igor de Oliveira Claber Siqueira, Ana Paula Drummond‐Lage, Sonia Souza, Eduardo Bruera
article en

Abstract

= 0.0021). Overall, 99.6% of patients died at home.ConclusionsPublicly funded HBPC can support a high intensity of medical and nursing care and enable successful home death for both oncological and non-oncological patients, even in socioeconomically vulnerable populations. While symptom profiles and care needs differ by diagnosis, functional status remains a key determinant of outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of PPS-guided care planning and workforce capacity to deliver equitable, scalable palliative care across disease groups.

American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Centro Universitário de Caratinga (BR), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (BR), Biostatistical Consulting (United States) (US), Hospital de Palamós (ES)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.