Instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG): A Systematic Review of Parameters Across Healthy, Older, and Neurological Populations

Background: The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) in the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test enables the quantitative assessment of functional performance and mobility. It allows for the determination not only of the total test completion time, but also of the durations of individual phases, as well as the derivation of spatiotemporal gait parameters and turning velocity. The aim of this review article was to compile parameters of the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test and to identify the parameters most commonly analyzed in populations of healthy adults, older adults, and patients with neurological disorders. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. The authors included studies in which commercial IMUs were used during the TUG test and quantitative parameters were analyzed. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for cross-sectional studies. Results: A total of 36 studies were included in the review. Only those disease entities represented by at least four studies were included in the tabular analysis. The study presents results for a total of 1268 individuals, including 192 healthy adults, 514 older adults, 230 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and 332 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The analysis showed that temporal parameters, particularly the total test duration and the durations of individual phases, were the most commonly reported across all populations. Conclusions: Turning-related parameters were analyzed frequently, whereas spatiotemporal parameters were assessed less often. The results indicate a lack of standardization both in the selection of iTUG parameters as well as in the measurement methods and systems used.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093307
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG): A Systematic Review of Parameters Across Healthy, Older, and Neurological Populations

Piotr Szaflik, Katarzyna Nowakowska-Lipiec
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
article

Instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG): A Systematic Review of Parameters Across Healthy, Older, and Neurological Populations

Piotr Szaflik, Katarzyna Nowakowska-Lipiec
article en

Abstract

Background: The use of inertial measurement units (IMUs) in the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test enables the quantitative assessment of functional performance and mobility. It allows for the determination not only of the total test completion time, but also of the durations of individual phases, as well as the derivation of spatiotemporal gait parameters and turning velocity. The aim of this review article was to compile parameters of the instrumented Timed Up and Go (iTUG) test and to identify the parameters most commonly analyzed in populations of healthy adults, older adults, and patients with neurological disorders. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases. The authors included studies in which commercial IMUs were used during the TUG test and quantitative parameters were analyzed. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for cross-sectional studies. Results: A total of 36 studies were included in the review. Only those disease entities represented by at least four studies were included in the tabular analysis. The study presents results for a total of 1268 individuals, including 192 healthy adults, 514 older adults, 230 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and 332 patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The analysis showed that temporal parameters, particularly the total test duration and the durations of individual phases, were the most commonly reported across all populations. Conclusions: Turning-related parameters were analyzed frequently, whereas spatiotemporal parameters were assessed less often. The results indicate a lack of standardization both in the selection of iTUG parameters as well as in the measurement methods and systems used.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(9)
Silesian University of Technology (PL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.