Optimizing Sensor Number and Placement for Accurate and Robust Center of Pressure Estimation on Instrumented Insoles

Smart insoles equipped with pressure sensor matrices are increasingly used for gait analysis, yet high-density arrays compromise battery life and data throughput. This study aims to identify the optimal sparse sensor layout required to accurately estimate the Center of Pressure (CoP) by analyzing the trade-off between sensor number, spatial placement, and reconstruction error. Plantar pressure data were collected from twelve healthy participants walking at a self-selected speed using 16-sensor connected insoles. A combinatorial algorithm evaluated all 216−1 possible sensor combinations to minimize the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in the antero-posterior, medio-lateral, and global Euclidean directions. Results reveal a non-linear convergence of accuracy that depends on the spatial axis. For longitudinal and global progression, a clear inflection point achieving sub-centimetric accuracy (RMSE < 5 mm) is reached at seven sensors. In contrast, medio-lateral tracking shows its largest discrete error reduction at five sensors, followed by gradual improvements at higher densities. Anatomical frequency analysis highlights distinct spatial requirements: the posterior heel is consistently selected for medio-lateral accuracy, while the lateral arch and metatarsal regions are critical for longitudinal progression. These findings suggest that while a minimum of seven strategically placed sensors enables robust CoP tracking across all spatial axes, optimal hardware design should remain task-specific. This work provides a data-driven framework for the development of energy-efficient wearable gait monitoring systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26092723
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Sensor Number and Placement for Accurate and Robust Center of Pressure Estimation on Instrumented Insoles

Pierre-Yves Joubert, Matthis Gautier, Fabien Parrain
Sensors
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Optimizing Sensor Number and Placement for Accurate and Robust Center of Pressure Estimation on Instrumented Insoles

Pierre-Yves Joubert, Matthis Gautier, Fabien Parrain
article en

Abstract

Smart insoles equipped with pressure sensor matrices are increasingly used for gait analysis, yet high-density arrays compromise battery life and data throughput. This study aims to identify the optimal sparse sensor layout required to accurately estimate the Center of Pressure (CoP) by analyzing the trade-off between sensor number, spatial placement, and reconstruction error. Plantar pressure data were collected from twelve healthy participants walking at a self-selected speed using 16-sensor connected insoles. A combinatorial algorithm evaluated all 216−1 possible sensor combinations to minimize the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) in the antero-posterior, medio-lateral, and global Euclidean directions. Results reveal a non-linear convergence of accuracy that depends on the spatial axis. For longitudinal and global progression, a clear inflection point achieving sub-centimetric accuracy (RMSE < 5 mm) is reached at seven sensors. In contrast, medio-lateral tracking shows its largest discrete error reduction at five sensors, followed by gradual improvements at higher densities. Anatomical frequency analysis highlights distinct spatial requirements: the posterior heel is consistently selected for medio-lateral accuracy, while the lateral arch and metatarsal regions are critical for longitudinal progression. These findings suggest that while a minimum of seven strategically placed sensors enables robust CoP tracking across all spatial axes, optimal hardware design should remain task-specific. This work provides a data-driven framework for the development of energy-efficient wearable gait monitoring systems.

SensorsVol. 26(9)
Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre de Nanosciences et de Nanotechnologies (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.