Access to Mental Health Services: Precariously Employed Workers Experiencing Anxiety or Depression Encounter Barriers When Seeking Care

Background: This study synthesizes findings on precariously employed workers’ self-reported feelings of severe or extreme anxiety and depression, along with their experiences accessing mental health services. Methods: This mixed-methods research included surveys (N = 259) and interviews (N = 40) with precariously employed workers in Ontario, Canada, conducted from November 2020 to July 2021. Inclusion criteria included: (i) not being directly employed, being self-employed, or a gig worker; (ii) not working full-time; (iii) not holding a permanent or open-ended contract; (iv) performing informal work; or (v) being recently unemployed. Results: The adjusted, statistically significant odds of reporting severe or extreme anxiety or depression were higher among workers with greater precarity (2.28), self-employed workers with no employees (3.61), gig or platform workers (3.08), workers earning less than 60% of the median income (2.75), and those unsure whether their hours would vary in the next three months (2.59). The odds were lower (0.22) for workers with some or little income variation in the previous three months. Interview participants described chronic stress, worry, anxiety, depression, and overall negative wellbeing linked to their precarious employment. Despite an increased need for mental health services, participants reported similar difficulties accessing them. Interpretation: To improve access to mental health services, sustainable intersectoral solutions with demonstrated potential are required, including increasing social and health expenditures, revising labor market legislation, and reorganizing the delivery of employer-dependent health services. Recommendations are made for solutions at various levels, including those that could be adopted by medical practitioners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Occupational Health
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/occuphealth1020018
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to Mental Health Services: Precariously Employed Workers Experiencing Anxiety or Depression Encounter Barriers When Seeking Care

Wayne Lewchuk, Pearl Buhariwala, Melissa Perri, Theo Bodin et al.
Occupational Health
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Access to Mental Health Services: Precariously Employed Workers Experiencing Anxiety or Depression Encounter Barriers When Seeking Care

Wayne Lewchuk, Pearl Buhariwala, Melissa Perri, Theo Bodin, Virginia Gunn, Sherry Baron, Carles Muntaner, Patricia O’Campo
article en

Abstract

Background: This study synthesizes findings on precariously employed workers’ self-reported feelings of severe or extreme anxiety and depression, along with their experiences accessing mental health services. Methods: This mixed-methods research included surveys (N = 259) and interviews (N = 40) with precariously employed workers in Ontario, Canada, conducted from November 2020 to July 2021. Inclusion criteria included: (i) not being directly employed, being self-employed, or a gig worker; (ii) not working full-time; (iii) not holding a permanent or open-ended contract; (iv) performing informal work; or (v) being recently unemployed. Results: The adjusted, statistically significant odds of reporting severe or extreme anxiety or depression were higher among workers with greater precarity (2.28), self-employed workers with no employees (3.61), gig or platform workers (3.08), workers earning less than 60% of the median income (2.75), and those unsure whether their hours would vary in the next three months (2.59). The odds were lower (0.22) for workers with some or little income variation in the previous three months. Interview participants described chronic stress, worry, anxiety, depression, and overall negative wellbeing linked to their precarious employment. Despite an increased need for mental health services, participants reported similar difficulties accessing them. Interpretation: To improve access to mental health services, sustainable intersectoral solutions with demonstrated potential are required, including increasing social and health expenditures, revising labor market legislation, and reorganizing the delivery of employer-dependent health services. Recommendations are made for solutions at various levels, including those that could be adopted by medical practitioners.

Occupational HealthVol. 1(2)
Cape Breton University (CA), Queens College, CUNY (US), Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), University of Toronto (CA), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Health Solutions (Sweden) (SE), Public Health Ontario (CA), Centre for Palaeogenetics (SE), McMaster University (CA)
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.