Farmers’ knowledge of, and attitudes towards oxpeckers in the Salambala Conservancy, northeastern Namibia

Oxpeckers ( Buphagus spp.) are obligate avian mutualists that feed on ectoparasites of large mammals, including cattle. Despite their ecological significance, few studies have examined local perceptions of oxpeckers in communal pastoral systems where chemical tick control is prevalent. This study assessed livestock farmers’ knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with oxpeckers in the Salambala Conservancy, northeastern Namibia, where Red-billed Oxpeckers and Yellow-billed Oxpeckers co-occur with managed cattle herds. Structured interviews were conducted with 200 randomly selected farmers. The respondent perceived oxpecker impact (positive or negative) on cattle farming was evaluated using scores from six impact responses. Data analyses were conducted to determine the association of predictor variables (participant socio-demographics, knowledge, attitude and perceptions) with perceived oxpecker impact using descriptive, random forest and linear modelling, univariate and multivariable statistics. Awareness of oxpeckers was high (99.5%). Tick control was practiced by 78% of farmers, primarily using synthetic pyrethroids and organophosphates (52%), while some farmers applied traditional practices (20.5%), or did not control at all (21.5%). Positive oxpecker perceptions predominated (79.5%), mainly linked to tick removal, although 29% reported negative impacts such as wound aggravation and blood-feeding. The final multivariable analysis revealed that respondents who applied oxpecker control measures had significantly lower impact scores (more negative oxpecker attitude) compared to those who did not (p < 0.0001). Conversely, respondents who wished for increasing oxpecker populations had significantly higher impact scores (more positive oxpecker attitude, p = 0.029). Suggestions to increase oxpecker populations were through conservation programs and captive breeding (29% respondents) and re-introduction of oxpeckers from other areas (19.5%). These findings highlight the importance of integrating ecological knowledge with socio-economic realities to promote coexistence. Strengthening integrated tick management approaches that reduce chemical control and keep ticks to acceptable numbers can enhance community-based conservation initiatives, which are critical for sustaining oxpecker-livestock interactions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/past.2026.15978
Primary Topic
Bird parasitology and diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Farmers’ knowledge of, and attitudes towards oxpeckers in the Salambala Conservancy, northeastern Namibia

Adrian Craig, Charles Byaruhanga, Michael S. Lukubwe
Pastoralism Research Policy and Practice
Bird parasitology and diseases
article

Farmers’ knowledge of, and attitudes towards oxpeckers in the Salambala Conservancy, northeastern Namibia

Adrian Craig, Charles Byaruhanga, Michael S. Lukubwe
article en

Abstract

Oxpeckers ( Buphagus spp.) are obligate avian mutualists that feed on ectoparasites of large mammals, including cattle. Despite their ecological significance, few studies have examined local perceptions of oxpeckers in communal pastoral systems where chemical tick control is prevalent. This study assessed livestock farmers’ knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with oxpeckers in the Salambala Conservancy, northeastern Namibia, where Red-billed Oxpeckers and Yellow-billed Oxpeckers co-occur with managed cattle herds. Structured interviews were conducted with 200 randomly selected farmers. The respondent perceived oxpecker impact (positive or negative) on cattle farming was evaluated using scores from six impact responses. Data analyses were conducted to determine the association of predictor variables (participant socio-demographics, knowledge, attitude and perceptions) with perceived oxpecker impact using descriptive, random forest and linear modelling, univariate and multivariable statistics. Awareness of oxpeckers was high (99.5%). Tick control was practiced by 78% of farmers, primarily using synthetic pyrethroids and organophosphates (52%), while some farmers applied traditional practices (20.5%), or did not control at all (21.5%). Positive oxpecker perceptions predominated (79.5%), mainly linked to tick removal, although 29% reported negative impacts such as wound aggravation and blood-feeding. The final multivariable analysis revealed that respondents who applied oxpecker control measures had significantly lower impact scores (more negative oxpecker attitude) compared to those who did not (p < 0.0001). Conversely, respondents who wished for increasing oxpecker populations had significantly higher impact scores (more positive oxpecker attitude, p = 0.029). Suggestions to increase oxpecker populations were through conservation programs and captive breeding (29% respondents) and re-introduction of oxpeckers from other areas (19.5%). These findings highlight the importance of integrating ecological knowledge with socio-economic realities to promote coexistence. Strengthening integrated tick management approaches that reduce chemical control and keep ticks to acceptable numbers can enhance community-based conservation initiatives, which are critical for sustaining oxpecker-livestock interactions.

Pastoralism Research Policy and PracticeVol. 16
Rhodes University (ZA), University of Namibia (NA), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Bird parasitology and diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.