A geometric and probabilistic framework for mechanistic antifungal screening from colony morphology
BACKGROUND: ) or minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)] that summarize growth suppression but provide limited information about geometry-linked failure modes, constraining mechanistic prioritization during early screening. Because colony morphology encodes growth direction and polarity, we developed a geometric and probabilistic screening framework to separate potency from polarity-linked failure modes in cacao- and coffee-relevant pathogens. RESULTS: From routine colony images, we computed a fixed-dose potency coordinate, λ, as the negative natural log of the area survival ratio, and a polarity coordinate, I, as the natural log fold-change in length-to-width ratio (treated/control). We then estimated polarity-disruption event probability (p̂) with exact 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence bounds at an operational threshold of τ = 1.10, with sensitivity analysis across τ = 1.10-1.20. In a single-dose primary screen across nine isolates and four phenolic-branched amide/acid candidates, amides consistently clustered in the (+λ, +I) quadrant, indicating an action direction characterized by concurrent growth suppression and polarity disruption relative to the acid analogues. The strongest combination was CGH5 treated with PhSOAM (λ = 0.67), which also showed high shape-disruption probability (p̂ = 0.75; 95% CI 0.43-0.95). Ellipse-based axis reconstruction linked I to axis-specific contraction ratios and showed strong agreement with direct length- and width-based ratios. Re-analysis of an independent UV-C exposure-time gradient (0-30 min) produced coherent dose-dependent λ(d) and I(d) trajectories and supported event-level inference at ~10 min. CONCLUSION: The λ-I-p grammar converts colony images into an instrument-agnostic screening language describing how strongly an intervention acts at the tested condition (λ), whether it is associated with polarity-linked geometry change (I) and how often a defined failure mode occurs (p̂), thereby supporting mechanistic screening and prioritization of candidate fungicides. Published 2026. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Authors
- Lyndel W. Meinhardt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8299-2629)
- Minhyeok Cha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9714-9554)
- Richard D. Ashby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-7545)
- Masoud Kazem‐Rostami (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4821-5820)
- Seunghyun Lim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3023-4863)
- Amelia H. Lovelace (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6793-7493)
- Ezekiel Ahn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4447-4104)
- Insuck Baek
- Moon S Kim
- Helen Ngo
- Sunchung Park (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-9476)
Institutions
- United States Department of Agriculture (US)
- Food Safety and Inspection Service (US)
- Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (US)
- Eastern Regional Research Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Pest Management Science
- Published
- 2026-04-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70860
- Primary Topic
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- Agricultural Research Service