A geometric and probabilistic framework for mechanistic antifungal screening from colony morphology

BACKGROUND: ) or minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)] that summarize growth suppression but provide limited information about geometry-linked failure modes, constraining mechanistic prioritization during early screening. Because colony morphology encodes growth direction and polarity, we developed a geometric and probabilistic screening framework to separate potency from polarity-linked failure modes in cacao- and coffee-relevant pathogens. RESULTS: From routine colony images, we computed a fixed-dose potency coordinate, λ, as the negative natural log of the area survival ratio, and a polarity coordinate, I, as the natural log fold-change in length-to-width ratio (treated/control). We then estimated polarity-disruption event probability (p̂) with exact 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence bounds at an operational threshold of τ = 1.10, with sensitivity analysis across τ = 1.10-1.20. In a single-dose primary screen across nine isolates and four phenolic-branched amide/acid candidates, amides consistently clustered in the (+λ, +I) quadrant, indicating an action direction characterized by concurrent growth suppression and polarity disruption relative to the acid analogues. The strongest combination was CGH5 treated with PhSOAM (λ = 0.67), which also showed high shape-disruption probability (p̂ = 0.75; 95% CI 0.43-0.95). Ellipse-based axis reconstruction linked I to axis-specific contraction ratios and showed strong agreement with direct length- and width-based ratios. Re-analysis of an independent UV-C exposure-time gradient (0-30 min) produced coherent dose-dependent λ(d) and I(d) trajectories and supported event-level inference at ~10 min. CONCLUSION: The λ-I-p grammar converts colony images into an instrument-agnostic screening language describing how strongly an intervention acts at the tested condition (λ), whether it is associated with polarity-linked geometry change (I) and how often a defined failure mode occurs (p̂), thereby supporting mechanistic screening and prioritization of candidate fungicides. Published 2026. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pest Management Science
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70860
Primary Topic
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A geometric and probabilistic framework for mechanistic antifungal screening from colony morphology

Lyndel W. Meinhardt, Minhyeok Cha, Richard D. Ashby, Masoud Kazem‐Rostami et al.
Pest Management Science
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
article

A geometric and probabilistic framework for mechanistic antifungal screening from colony morphology

Lyndel W. Meinhardt, Minhyeok Cha, Richard D. Ashby, Masoud Kazem‐Rostami, Seunghyun Lim, Amelia H. Lovelace, Ezekiel Ahn, Insuck Baek, Moon S Kim, Helen Ngo, Sunchung Park
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: ) or minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)] that summarize growth suppression but provide limited information about geometry-linked failure modes, constraining mechanistic prioritization during early screening. Because colony morphology encodes growth direction and polarity, we developed a geometric and probabilistic screening framework to separate potency from polarity-linked failure modes in cacao- and coffee-relevant pathogens. RESULTS: From routine colony images, we computed a fixed-dose potency coordinate, λ, as the negative natural log of the area survival ratio, and a polarity coordinate, I, as the natural log fold-change in length-to-width ratio (treated/control). We then estimated polarity-disruption event probability (p̂) with exact 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence bounds at an operational threshold of τ = 1.10, with sensitivity analysis across τ = 1.10-1.20. In a single-dose primary screen across nine isolates and four phenolic-branched amide/acid candidates, amides consistently clustered in the (+λ, +I) quadrant, indicating an action direction characterized by concurrent growth suppression and polarity disruption relative to the acid analogues. The strongest combination was CGH5 treated with PhSOAM (λ = 0.67), which also showed high shape-disruption probability (p̂ = 0.75; 95% CI 0.43-0.95). Ellipse-based axis reconstruction linked I to axis-specific contraction ratios and showed strong agreement with direct length- and width-based ratios. Re-analysis of an independent UV-C exposure-time gradient (0-30 min) produced coherent dose-dependent λ(d) and I(d) trajectories and supported event-level inference at ~10 min. CONCLUSION: The λ-I-p grammar converts colony images into an instrument-agnostic screening language describing how strongly an intervention acts at the tested condition (λ), whether it is associated with polarity-linked geometry change (I) and how often a defined failure mode occurs (p̂), thereby supporting mechanistic screening and prioritization of candidate fungicides. Published 2026. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Pest Management Science
United States Department of Agriculture (US), Food Safety and Inspection Service (US), Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (US), Eastern Regional Research Center (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.