Exploring the use of a digital visual collaboration platform in pediatric clinical teaching: medical students’ experiences and perceptions—cross-sectional study

Background Digital visual collaboration tools are increasingly used in clinical education to promote engagement, reasoning, and interactive learning. Miro, a digital workspace, supports student-centered, case-based learning. This study aimed to assess medical students’ satisfaction, perceptions, and experiences with Miro during a pediatric clinical module. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among fifth-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk. Miro was implemented as a learning approach in small-group pediatric case-based sessions. The self-administered questionnaire included 29 items across six domains: perception of the learning method, satisfaction with the learning experience, experience with Miro as a tool, cognitive reasoning and analytical processes, self-directed learning, and perceived challenges. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed, including gender-based comparisons using Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests. Results A total of 136 students (76 females, 60 males) participated. Overall, students reported positive perceptions and satisfaction with Miro, with mean scores exceeding 4.0 on most items. The highest-rated statements were “The contents and composition of the topic were suitable to the students’ level” (mean = 3.93 ± 1.00) and “I was able to learn how to build a hypothesis about the case scenario” (mean = 3.86 ± 0.90). Most students rated analytical and reasoning tasks as reasonable in difficulty. Gender analysis revealed significant differences in perceived barriers and educational value: males reported higher perceived engagement, whereas females more often cited vague goals and limited resources. Conclusion Miro was positively perceived by students as a visual learning platform in pediatric clinical modules. While students of all genders found it beneficial, gender-based disparities in experience and perceived challenges underscore the need for inclusive instructional strategies and targeted support to optimize digital learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1818596
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the use of a digital visual collaboration platform in pediatric clinical teaching: medical students’ experiences and perceptions—cross-sectional study

Laila AlBishi
Frontiers in Medicine
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Exploring the use of a digital visual collaboration platform in pediatric clinical teaching: medical students’ experiences and perceptions—cross-sectional study

Laila AlBishi
article en

Abstract

Background Digital visual collaboration tools are increasingly used in clinical education to promote engagement, reasoning, and interactive learning. Miro, a digital workspace, supports student-centered, case-based learning. This study aimed to assess medical students’ satisfaction, perceptions, and experiences with Miro during a pediatric clinical module. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among fifth-year medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Tabuk. Miro was implemented as a learning approach in small-group pediatric case-based sessions. The self-administered questionnaire included 29 items across six domains: perception of the learning method, satisfaction with the learning experience, experience with Miro as a tool, cognitive reasoning and analytical processes, self-directed learning, and perceived challenges. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed, including gender-based comparisons using Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests. Results A total of 136 students (76 females, 60 males) participated. Overall, students reported positive perceptions and satisfaction with Miro, with mean scores exceeding 4.0 on most items. The highest-rated statements were “The contents and composition of the topic were suitable to the students’ level” (mean = 3.93 ± 1.00) and “I was able to learn how to build a hypothesis about the case scenario” (mean = 3.86 ± 0.90). Most students rated analytical and reasoning tasks as reasonable in difficulty. Gender analysis revealed significant differences in perceived barriers and educational value: males reported higher perceived engagement, whereas females more often cited vague goals and limited resources. Conclusion Miro was positively perceived by students as a visual learning platform in pediatric clinical modules. While students of all genders found it beneficial, gender-based disparities in experience and perceived challenges underscore the need for inclusive instructional strategies and targeted support to optimize digital learning environments.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
University of Tabuk (SA)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.