From FII Dependence to DII Dominance: Behavioral Dynamics and Minskyan Risk in India’s Stock Market

This study examines how market leadership in Indian equities has structurally shifted away from foreign institutional investors (FIIs) toward domestic institutional investors (DIIs) and mutual funds (MFs), and it evaluates the systemic risks created by this rebalancing. Using monthly transaction data from April 2007 to January 2026, we analyze evolving investment patterns among FIIs, DIIs, and MFs by employing trend analysis, Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation analyses, phase decomposition, stationarity tests, Granger causality analysis, ARIMA modelling, and GARCH volatility estimation. Since 2021, FIIs have recorded cumulative net outflows exceeding ₹8.68 lakh crore (US$95.36 billion), while DIIs mainly led by mutual funds financed largely through Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs) have made net purchases of over ₹19.37 lakh crore (US$212.67 billion), effectively absorbing FII selling and helping to maintain elevated index levels. The trend continues with SENSEX having remained above 80,000 points through 2025 despite persistent FII disengagement. The DII share of total market purchases rose from approximately 39% in 2017 to over 54% by January 2026, documenting a structural shift in market composition. The results show that DII flows have stayed positively and significantly correlated with SENSEX, with FII flows being significantly negatively correlated. Granger causality tests suggest market-responsive rather than market-driving behavior by domestic institutions. Drawing upon Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis and behavioral finance frameworks, we interpret that prolonged domestic absorption of FII exists where direct fundamental evidence is unavailable. The Minsky-type fragility interpretation is offered as a structured hypothesis for future empirical investigation. The findings carry important implications for retail investors, fund managers, and regulators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2026-04-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19050315
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From FII Dependence to DII Dominance: Behavioral Dynamics and Minskyan Risk in India’s Stock Market

Deepak Raghava Naik, Suneel Maheshwari
Journal of risk and financial management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

From FII Dependence to DII Dominance: Behavioral Dynamics and Minskyan Risk in India’s Stock Market

Deepak Raghava Naik, Suneel Maheshwari
article en

Abstract

This study examines how market leadership in Indian equities has structurally shifted away from foreign institutional investors (FIIs) toward domestic institutional investors (DIIs) and mutual funds (MFs), and it evaluates the systemic risks created by this rebalancing. Using monthly transaction data from April 2007 to January 2026, we analyze evolving investment patterns among FIIs, DIIs, and MFs by employing trend analysis, Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation analyses, phase decomposition, stationarity tests, Granger causality analysis, ARIMA modelling, and GARCH volatility estimation. Since 2021, FIIs have recorded cumulative net outflows exceeding ₹8.68 lakh crore (US$95.36 billion), while DIIs mainly led by mutual funds financed largely through Systematic Investment Plans (SIPs) have made net purchases of over ₹19.37 lakh crore (US$212.67 billion), effectively absorbing FII selling and helping to maintain elevated index levels. The trend continues with SENSEX having remained above 80,000 points through 2025 despite persistent FII disengagement. The DII share of total market purchases rose from approximately 39% in 2017 to over 54% by January 2026, documenting a structural shift in market composition. The results show that DII flows have stayed positively and significantly correlated with SENSEX, with FII flows being significantly negatively correlated. Granger causality tests suggest market-responsive rather than market-driving behavior by domestic institutions. Drawing upon Minsky’s financial instability hypothesis and behavioral finance frameworks, we interpret that prolonged domestic absorption of FII exists where direct fundamental evidence is unavailable. The Minsky-type fragility interpretation is offered as a structured hypothesis for future empirical investigation. The findings carry important implications for retail investors, fund managers, and regulators.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 19(5)
Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US), M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences (IN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.