Conditional Support, Persistent Distrust: South Korean Attitudes Toward Denuclearization Negotiations with North Korea

For populations living under persistent nuclear threat, such as South Korea, denuclearization represents a direct pathway to peace. Yet the conditions under which South Koreans support denuclearization negotiations with North Korea remain underexplored. This study examines South Korean public attitudes toward denuclearization agreements using a pre-registered survey experiment with 2,400 nationally matched respondents. Participants evaluated a hypothetical agreement in which North Korea commits to dismantling its nuclear program in exchange for one of five concessions: regime security guarantees, sanctions relief, financial assistance, withdrawal of US troops and extended deterrence, or South Korea’s permanent commitment to nonproliferation. Support is highest for low-cost concessions and significantly lower when agreements impose substantial economic burdens or security trade-offs. Across all scenarios, trust in North Korea’s compliance remains uniformly low. These findings reveal the fragility of domestic support for denuclearization and highlight the importance of cost sensitivity, while pointing to persistent distrust as a key constraint on public support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2026.2658140
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conditional Support, Persistent Distrust: South Korean Attitudes Toward Denuclearization Negotiations with North Korea

Hye‐Sung Kim
Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

Conditional Support, Persistent Distrust: South Korean Attitudes Toward Denuclearization Negotiations with North Korea

Hye‐Sung Kim
article en

Abstract

For populations living under persistent nuclear threat, such as South Korea, denuclearization represents a direct pathway to peace. Yet the conditions under which South Koreans support denuclearization negotiations with North Korea remain underexplored. This study examines South Korean public attitudes toward denuclearization agreements using a pre-registered survey experiment with 2,400 nationally matched respondents. Participants evaluated a hypothetical agreement in which North Korea commits to dismantling its nuclear program in exchange for one of five concessions: regime security guarantees, sanctions relief, financial assistance, withdrawal of US troops and extended deterrence, or South Korea’s permanent commitment to nonproliferation. Support is highest for low-cost concessions and significantly lower when agreements impose substantial economic burdens or security trade-offs. Across all scenarios, trust in North Korea’s compliance remains uniformly low. These findings reveal the fragility of domestic support for denuclearization and highlight the importance of cost sensitivity, while pointing to persistent distrust as a key constraint on public support.

Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament
Appalachian State University (US)
University Research Council, Aga Khan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.