Methodological Appraisal of the Munro Scale: Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Accuracy in Adult Surgical Patients: A Methodological Study

Background: Pressure injuries during the perioperative period can adversely affect postoperative outcomes and patient recovery. An essential component of prevention and patient care is systematic risk assessment. The Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale is a perioperative-specific tool designed to evaluate patients' risk for pressure injuries, enabling early identification of high-risk individuals and facilitating timely preventive interventions by perioperative nurses. Aim: This methodological study aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability, and diagnostic Accuracy of the Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale (Munro Scale) in adult patients undergoing surgery. Method: This methodological study was conducted on a sample of 200 adult surgical patients from October 2024 to May 2025. Data were collected using the Munro Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale alongside a demographic questionnaire. The scale underwent a rigorous process of translation and cultural adaptation following established methodological standards. Psychometric testing encompasses evaluations of content validity, construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Result: Out of 200 surgical patients, 37 (18.5%) developed pressure injuries, mostly classified as Stage I and Stage II. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted using AMOS to evaluate the construct validity of the scale, which included three latent factors: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors. Factor loadings for most items exceeded 0.4, indicating acceptable item relevance. Reliability analysis showed Cronbach's alpha values of 0.84, 0.62, and 0.83 for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, respectively. Composite reliability (CR) values were 0.83, 0.71, and 0.82, confirming acceptable internal consistency. Conclusion: The Munro Scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity, confirmatory factor analysis indicating a moderate or limited fit. This scale can be used to assess the risk of pressure injuries in perioperative patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Science Reports
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.72464
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological Appraisal of the Munro Scale: Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Accuracy in Adult Surgical Patients: A Methodological Study

Rana Abjar, Leila Sadati, Niloofar Hajati, Nasim Jamshid Malekara et al.
Health Science Reports
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Methodological Appraisal of the Munro Scale: Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Accuracy in Adult Surgical Patients: A Methodological Study

Rana Abjar, Leila Sadati, Niloofar Hajati, Nasim Jamshid Malekara, Sahar Karami, Cassendra A. Munro
article en

Abstract

Background: Pressure injuries during the perioperative period can adversely affect postoperative outcomes and patient recovery. An essential component of prevention and patient care is systematic risk assessment. The Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale is a perioperative-specific tool designed to evaluate patients' risk for pressure injuries, enabling early identification of high-risk individuals and facilitating timely preventive interventions by perioperative nurses. Aim: This methodological study aimed to evaluate the validity, reliability, and diagnostic Accuracy of the Munro Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale (Munro Scale) in adult patients undergoing surgery. Method: This methodological study was conducted on a sample of 200 adult surgical patients from October 2024 to May 2025. Data were collected using the Munro Pressure Injury Risk Assessment Scale alongside a demographic questionnaire. The scale underwent a rigorous process of translation and cultural adaptation following established methodological standards. Psychometric testing encompasses evaluations of content validity, construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Result: Out of 200 surgical patients, 37 (18.5%) developed pressure injuries, mostly classified as Stage I and Stage II. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted using AMOS to evaluate the construct validity of the scale, which included three latent factors: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative risk factors. Factor loadings for most items exceeded 0.4, indicating acceptable item relevance. Reliability analysis showed Cronbach's alpha values of 0.84, 0.62, and 0.83 for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, respectively. Composite reliability (CR) values were 0.83, 0.71, and 0.82, confirming acceptable internal consistency. Conclusion: The Munro Scale demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity, confirmatory factor analysis indicating a moderate or limited fit. This scale can be used to assess the risk of pressure injuries in perioperative patients.

Health Science ReportsVol. 9(5)
Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR), Urmia University of Technology (IR), Islamic Azad University Medical Branch of Tehran (IR), Urmia University (IR), Stanford Health Care (US), Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.