Synolitic Graph Neural Networks for MRI-Derived Radiomic-Based Prediction of Prostate Cancer Progression on Active Surveillance

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in men, and active surveillance (AS) is the recommended management strategy for low- and favourable intermediate-risk disease. Predicting which patients will progress during AS remains a clinical challenge. MRI-derived radiomics has shown promise for risk stratification, but conventional machine learning approaches treat radiomic features as independent variables and may not capture the complex inter-feature dependencies within imaging data. This study evaluates the application of Synolitic Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs) to baseline MRI-derived radiomic features for predicting prostate cancer progression on active surveillance. Methods: We studied 343 AS patients (73 progressors, 270 non-progressors) from a single-centre cohort prospectively enrolled between 2013 and 2019 and retrospectively analysed. Seventy-two radiomic features were extracted from baseline 3T MRI (T2-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient maps), together with three clinical variables (prostate volume, PSA, PSA density). The SGNN pipeline transformed each patient’s feature profile into a weighted graph encoding pairwise feature relationships via logistic regression classifiers trained within each cross-validation fold. GCN and GATv2 architectures were evaluated with multiple sparsification strategies and compared against Gradient Boosting, SVM, Random Forest, and logistic regression using 5-fold stratified cross-validation. Results: Among conventional methods, Gradient Boosting achieved the highest ROC-AUC (0.634 ± 0.080). The SGNN pipeline with GATv2, confidence-based sparsification (p = 0.8), and extended node features incorporating graph centrality measures achieved the best performance (ROC-AUC = 0.699 ± 0.044), an absolute improvement of 0.065 over the best conventional method. The addition of topological node features consistently improved performance by 3–5% across configurations. GATv2 outperformed GCN in matched settings. Conclusions: As a proof of concept, the SGNN framework achieved the highest mean ROC-AUC among the evaluated single-timepoint approaches, though results require confirmation in independent external cohorts. By encoding inter-feature relationships as patient-specific graphs, SGNN offers a complementary modelling paradigm for radiomic data in clinical oncology. Future work should incorporate longitudinal data and graph explainability methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18091389
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synolitic Graph Neural Networks for MRI-Derived Radiomic-Based Prediction of Prostate Cancer Progression on Active Surveillance

Tristan Barrett, Nikita Sushentsev, Alexey Zaikin, Mikhail I. Krivonosov et al.
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Synolitic Graph Neural Networks for MRI-Derived Radiomic-Based Prediction of Prostate Cancer Progression on Active Surveillance

Tristan Barrett, Nikita Sushentsev, Alexey Zaikin, Mikhail I. Krivonosov, Arseniy Trukhanov
article en

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent malignancies in men, and active surveillance (AS) is the recommended management strategy for low- and favourable intermediate-risk disease. Predicting which patients will progress during AS remains a clinical challenge. MRI-derived radiomics has shown promise for risk stratification, but conventional machine learning approaches treat radiomic features as independent variables and may not capture the complex inter-feature dependencies within imaging data. This study evaluates the application of Synolitic Graph Neural Networks (SGNNs) to baseline MRI-derived radiomic features for predicting prostate cancer progression on active surveillance. Methods: We studied 343 AS patients (73 progressors, 270 non-progressors) from a single-centre cohort prospectively enrolled between 2013 and 2019 and retrospectively analysed. Seventy-two radiomic features were extracted from baseline 3T MRI (T2-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient maps), together with three clinical variables (prostate volume, PSA, PSA density). The SGNN pipeline transformed each patient’s feature profile into a weighted graph encoding pairwise feature relationships via logistic regression classifiers trained within each cross-validation fold. GCN and GATv2 architectures were evaluated with multiple sparsification strategies and compared against Gradient Boosting, SVM, Random Forest, and logistic regression using 5-fold stratified cross-validation. Results: Among conventional methods, Gradient Boosting achieved the highest ROC-AUC (0.634 ± 0.080). The SGNN pipeline with GATv2, confidence-based sparsification (p = 0.8), and extended node features incorporating graph centrality measures achieved the best performance (ROC-AUC = 0.699 ± 0.044), an absolute improvement of 0.065 over the best conventional method. The addition of topological node features consistently improved performance by 3–5% across configurations. GATv2 outperformed GCN in matched settings. Conclusions: As a proof of concept, the SGNN framework achieved the highest mean ROC-AUC among the evaluated single-timepoint approaches, though results require confirmation in independent external cohorts. By encoding inter-feature relationships as patient-specific graphs, SGNN offers a complementary modelling paradigm for radiomic data in clinical oncology. Future work should incorporate longitudinal data and graph explainability methods.

CancersVol. 18(9)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), University of Cambridge (GB), Cambridge School (PT), University College London (GB), N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod (RU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.