Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical, Surface, and Dimensional Properties of <scp>3D</scp> ‐Printed Aligners: Influence of Printer Type and Nitrogen‐Assisted Post‐Curing

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the mechanical, surface, and dimensional properties of 3D-printed clear aligners (CA) fabricated using liquid crystal display (LCD) and digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing systems with nitrogen treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens were manufactured using LCD (Uniz NBEE) and DLP (Nextdent 5100) printers. Post-processing included residual resin removal and post-curing, with half of the specimens receiving nitrogen treatment. UV intensity was measured for each printer. Mechanical properties were assessed using tensile strength (n = 10), Shore D hardness (n = 8), and nano-indentation (n = 3). Optical and surface properties were assessed using translucency (n = 6) and surface roughness (n = 5). The accuracy of the CAs was assessed using root mean square deviation analysis (n = 4). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test and an independent samples t-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The LCD system showed more consistent UV intensity patterns during printing compared to the DLP system, as well as superior mechanical properties with higher tensile strength and Shore D hardness (p < 0.001). Nitrogen treatment significantly enhanced nano-indentation parameters, including Martens hardness and the elastic index in both LCD- and DLP-printed groups (p < 0.001). Both systems exhibited comparable translucency, surface roughness, and accuracy (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The choice of 3D printing systems significantly influenced CA properties. The LCD printing system demonstrated superior mechanical performance compared with the DLP system. In addition, nitrogen treatment significantly improved nano-indentation-derived mechanical properties, including Martens hardness and the elastic index. These findings suggest that the selection of the printing system and post-curing conditions may influence the mechanical performance of CAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.70132
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical, Surface, and Dimensional Properties of 3D ‐Printed Aligners: Influence of Printer Type and Nitrogen‐Assisted Post‐Curing

Geelsu Hwang, G Y Kim, Jinwoo Kim, Jae‐Hun Yu et al.
Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Comparative Analysis of the Mechanical, Surface, and Dimensional Properties of 3D ‐Printed Aligners: Influence of Printer Type and Nitrogen‐Assisted Post‐Curing

Geelsu Hwang, G Y Kim, Jinwoo Kim, Jae‐Hun Yu, Utkarsh Mangal, Sung‐Hwan Choi, Jae‐Sung Kwon
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the mechanical, surface, and dimensional properties of 3D-printed clear aligners (CA) fabricated using liquid crystal display (LCD) and digital light processing (DLP) 3D printing systems with nitrogen treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens were manufactured using LCD (Uniz NBEE) and DLP (Nextdent 5100) printers. Post-processing included residual resin removal and post-curing, with half of the specimens receiving nitrogen treatment. UV intensity was measured for each printer. Mechanical properties were assessed using tensile strength (n = 10), Shore D hardness (n = 8), and nano-indentation (n = 3). Optical and surface properties were assessed using translucency (n = 6) and surface roughness (n = 5). The accuracy of the CAs was assessed using root mean square deviation analysis (n = 4). Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's test and an independent samples t-test (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The LCD system showed more consistent UV intensity patterns during printing compared to the DLP system, as well as superior mechanical properties with higher tensile strength and Shore D hardness (p < 0.001). Nitrogen treatment significantly enhanced nano-indentation parameters, including Martens hardness and the elastic index in both LCD- and DLP-printed groups (p < 0.001). Both systems exhibited comparable translucency, surface roughness, and accuracy (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The choice of 3D printing systems significantly influenced CA properties. The LCD printing system demonstrated superior mechanical performance compared with the DLP system. In addition, nitrogen treatment significantly improved nano-indentation-derived mechanical properties, including Martens hardness and the elastic index. These findings suggest that the selection of the printing system and post-curing conditions may influence the mechanical performance of CAs.

Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Yonsei University (KR), Yonsei University Dental Hospital (KR), Yonsei University College of Dentistry, University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.