Frequency of extractable nuclear antigen seropositivity among individuals seronegative for antinuclear antibodies on indirect immunofluorescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background The frequency of extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) seropositivity in patients with negative antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) remains insufficiently characterized. We aimed to estimate the frequency of ENA seropositivity among ANA-IIF–negative individuals (ENA+/IIF−), and to identify associated clinical and methodological determinants. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies published up to January 31, 2025. Studies evaluating ENA seropositivity in ANA-IIF–negative patients using HEp-2 or HEp-2000 substrates were included. Meta-analysis was performed using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation and random-effects models. Results Twenty-eight studies, comprising 33 distinct patient groups and 28,552 ANA-IIF–negative samples, were included. The pooled proportion of ENA+/IIF− was 14.1% (95% CI: 10%–18.7%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 99%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant variation according to clinical indication: 1.4% (95% CI: 1.1%–1.9%) in unspecified indications, 8.1% (95% CI: 6%–10.5%) in suspected connective tissue disease (CTD), and 44.1% (95% CI: 32.3%–54.6%) in confirmed CTD (p < 0.0001). Multivariable meta-regression identified the IIF cut-off dilution, anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, and anti-tRNA synthetase antibodies as significant determinants of ENA+/IIF− frequency. Discussion This meta-analysis confirmed that ENA seropositivity is not uncommon in ANA-IIF–negative individuals, and it varies according to clinical context. A negative ANA-IIF result does not reliably exclude CTD, particularly in patients with strong clinical suspicion of CTD. These findings support a targeted, clinically driven ENA testing strategy, especially in conditions such as Sjögren syndrome and inflammatory myopathies. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/ , identifier CRD420250654499.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1745828
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frequency of extractable nuclear antigen seropositivity among individuals seronegative for antinuclear antibodies on indirect immunofluorescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yousr Galaï, T. Ben Abdallah, Imen Sfar, Tarak Dhaouadi et al.
Frontiers in Immunology
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Frequency of extractable nuclear antigen seropositivity among individuals seronegative for antinuclear antibodies on indirect immunofluorescence: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yousr Galaï, T. Ben Abdallah, Imen Sfar, Tarak Dhaouadi, Ahlem Ben Hmid, Mèlika Ben Ahmed, Imen Zamali, Samar Samoud, Y Gorgi, Mariem Guizani, Awatef Riahi
article en

Abstract

Background The frequency of extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) seropositivity in patients with negative antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) remains insufficiently characterized. We aimed to estimate the frequency of ENA seropositivity among ANA-IIF–negative individuals (ENA+/IIF−), and to identify associated clinical and methodological determinants. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted for studies published up to January 31, 2025. Studies evaluating ENA seropositivity in ANA-IIF–negative patients using HEp-2 or HEp-2000 substrates were included. Meta-analysis was performed using the Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation and random-effects models. Results Twenty-eight studies, comprising 33 distinct patient groups and 28,552 ANA-IIF–negative samples, were included. The pooled proportion of ENA+/IIF− was 14.1% (95% CI: 10%–18.7%), with substantial heterogeneity (I² = 99%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant variation according to clinical indication: 1.4% (95% CI: 1.1%–1.9%) in unspecified indications, 8.1% (95% CI: 6%–10.5%) in suspected connective tissue disease (CTD), and 44.1% (95% CI: 32.3%–54.6%) in confirmed CTD (p < 0.0001). Multivariable meta-regression identified the IIF cut-off dilution, anti-SSA/Ro antibodies, and anti-tRNA synthetase antibodies as significant determinants of ENA+/IIF− frequency. Discussion This meta-analysis confirmed that ENA seropositivity is not uncommon in ANA-IIF–negative individuals, and it varies according to clinical context. A negative ANA-IIF result does not reliably exclude CTD, particularly in patients with strong clinical suspicion of CTD. These findings support a targeted, clinically driven ENA testing strategy, especially in conditions such as Sjögren syndrome and inflammatory myopathies. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/ , identifier CRD420250654499.

Frontiers in ImmunologyVol. 17
Tunis University (TN), Hôpital Charles-Nicolle (TN), Institut Pasteur de Tunis (TN), Faculté de médecine de Tunis, Tunis El Manar University (TN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.