Experimental Comparison of Frequency Tuning Strategies for Piezoelectric Cantilever Beam: Implications for Bridge Vibration Harvesting

Piezoelectric cantilever beam harvesters are widely considered for self-powered bridge monitoring, yet their performance is often constrained by resonance detuning under low-frequency ambient vibrations. This issue is particularly pronounced in bridge environments, where the dominant vibration frequencies are typically low and narrowly distributed. While several frequency tuning strategies have been proposed, their relative effectiveness under bridge-relevant conditions has not been systematically evaluated within a unified experimental framework. This study experimentally evaluated four tuning strategies for cantilever piezoelectric energy harvesters, i.e., spring tuning, magnetic tuning, tip mass adjustment, and beam length modification, to identify effective methods for matching the dominant frequency of bridge deck vibrations. A unified test platform using a common harvester configuration was established, and performance was quantified by resonant frequency alignment, maximum output voltage, and −3 dB bandwidth. Among the four methods, root-based spring tuning showed the best overall performance, achieving frequency matching while retaining strong electrical output, with a maximum voltage of 9.01 V and a bandwidth of approximately 1.5 Hz. Magnetic tuning also provided accurate frequency control, but reduced voltage by 15–25%. By contrast, tip mass and beam length tuning produced larger resonance shifts but caused voltage reductions of up to approximately 50%.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19092106
Primary Topic
Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Comparison of Frequency Tuning Strategies for Piezoelectric Cantilever Beam: Implications for Bridge Vibration Harvesting

Wenjie Feng, Zhenru Shu, Yuan Cai
Energies
Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
article

Experimental Comparison of Frequency Tuning Strategies for Piezoelectric Cantilever Beam: Implications for Bridge Vibration Harvesting

Wenjie Feng, Zhenru Shu, Yuan Cai
article en

Abstract

Piezoelectric cantilever beam harvesters are widely considered for self-powered bridge monitoring, yet their performance is often constrained by resonance detuning under low-frequency ambient vibrations. This issue is particularly pronounced in bridge environments, where the dominant vibration frequencies are typically low and narrowly distributed. While several frequency tuning strategies have been proposed, their relative effectiveness under bridge-relevant conditions has not been systematically evaluated within a unified experimental framework. This study experimentally evaluated four tuning strategies for cantilever piezoelectric energy harvesters, i.e., spring tuning, magnetic tuning, tip mass adjustment, and beam length modification, to identify effective methods for matching the dominant frequency of bridge deck vibrations. A unified test platform using a common harvester configuration was established, and performance was quantified by resonant frequency alignment, maximum output voltage, and −3 dB bandwidth. Among the four methods, root-based spring tuning showed the best overall performance, achieving frequency matching while retaining strong electrical output, with a maximum voltage of 9.01 V and a bandwidth of approximately 1.5 Hz. Magnetic tuning also provided accurate frequency control, but reduced voltage by 15–25%. By contrast, tip mass and beam length tuning produced larger resonance shifts but caused voltage reductions of up to approximately 50%.

EnergiesVol. 19(9)
Central South University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.