The clinical observation of ciprofol versus propofol anesthesia in hysteroscopic electrosurgical resection of submucosal myomas

Background To evaluate the clinical efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol combined with alfentanil for anesthesia in patients undergoing hysteroscopic transcervical resection of submucosal myomas. Methods A total of 208 patients scheduled for hysteroscopic transcervical resection of submucosal myomas were randomly allocated into ciprofol (group C) and propofol (group P) groups after exclusion. All patients received intravenous alfentanil 10 μg/kg before induction. The group C received intravenous ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg, while the group P received intravenous propofol 2.0 mg/kg. After anesthesia induction, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted. Anesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of ciprofol 0.8 mg/(kg·h) or propofol 5 mg/(kg·h) using a micro-infusion pump until the end of surgery. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded at the following time points: Pre-anesthesia (T0), after anesthesia induction (T1), during cervical dilation (T2), during electrosurgical resection (T3), and at the end of surgery (T4). Total dosage of study drug, recovery time, orientation recovery time, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for uterine contraction pain after awakening, and adverse events were recorded. Results Intraoperative decreases in MAP and HR were significantly greater in the group P than in the group C ( p < 0.05). The total anesthetic dosage was significantly higher in the group P ( p < 0.05). Recovery time and orientation recovery time were longer in the group C compared with the group P ( p < 0.05). VAS scores at 5 and 15 min after awakening were significantly lower in the ciprofol group ( p < 0.05). The incidence of injection pain was much higher in Group P than that in Group C ( p < 0.001). The rate of respiratory inhibition was significantly lower in Group C than that in Group P ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Ciprofol exhibits comparable efficacy to that of propofol. It has good analgesic activity, more stable hemodynamics, and minimal respiratory disturbance, less injection pain rate in hysteroscopic transcervical resection of submucosal myoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1829147
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The clinical observation of ciprofol versus propofol anesthesia in hysteroscopic electrosurgical resection of submucosal myomas

Hui Li, Bin Lin, Tong Li, Xiaoshu Zheng et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

The clinical observation of ciprofol versus propofol anesthesia in hysteroscopic electrosurgical resection of submucosal myomas

Hui Li, Bin Lin, Tong Li, Xiaoshu Zheng, Yong Guo
article en

Abstract

Background To evaluate the clinical efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol combined with alfentanil for anesthesia in patients undergoing hysteroscopic transcervical resection of submucosal myomas. Methods A total of 208 patients scheduled for hysteroscopic transcervical resection of submucosal myomas were randomly allocated into ciprofol (group C) and propofol (group P) groups after exclusion. All patients received intravenous alfentanil 10 μg/kg before induction. The group C received intravenous ciprofol 0.4 mg/kg, while the group P received intravenous propofol 2.0 mg/kg. After anesthesia induction, a laryngeal mask airway was inserted. Anesthesia was maintained with a continuous infusion of ciprofol 0.8 mg/(kg·h) or propofol 5 mg/(kg·h) using a micro-infusion pump until the end of surgery. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and bispectral index (BIS) were recorded at the following time points: Pre-anesthesia (T0), after anesthesia induction (T1), during cervical dilation (T2), during electrosurgical resection (T3), and at the end of surgery (T4). Total dosage of study drug, recovery time, orientation recovery time, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for uterine contraction pain after awakening, and adverse events were recorded. Results Intraoperative decreases in MAP and HR were significantly greater in the group P than in the group C ( p < 0.05). The total anesthetic dosage was significantly higher in the group P ( p < 0.05). Recovery time and orientation recovery time were longer in the group C compared with the group P ( p < 0.05). VAS scores at 5 and 15 min after awakening were significantly lower in the ciprofol group ( p < 0.05). The incidence of injection pain was much higher in Group P than that in Group C ( p < 0.001). The rate of respiratory inhibition was significantly lower in Group C than that in Group P ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Ciprofol exhibits comparable efficacy to that of propofol. It has good analgesic activity, more stable hemodynamics, and minimal respiratory disturbance, less injection pain rate in hysteroscopic transcervical resection of submucosal myoma.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Pennsylvania State University (US), Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN), Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.