Crop modeling and multivariate analysis of some bread wheat genotypes under drought stress

One important abiotic factor affecting wheat yield and endangering global food security is drought stress. Thus, to evaluate these genotypes based on their water usage efficiency and drought susceptibility index, the current study used 10 extremely diverse bread wheat genotypes over the winter seasons of 2023/2024 and 2024/2025. Additionally, the correlation coefficients between grain yield and its components are broken down into direct and indirect impacts, and the fitted model for grain yield and its components in both normal and drought-stressed environments was evaluated. For every variable examined, there were very significant differences between the genotypes under both favorable and stressful conditions. The genotypes G3, G6, and G8, which are distinguished by a high yield index (YI: >1), low drought susceptibility index (<1), and high yielding stability index, were more adaptive in both environments. While genotypes G2 and G9 were suited to normal conditions in both seasons, genotypes G4 and G7 were adapted to drought stress. Grain yield was directly positively impacted by the characteristics of number of tillers (NT), thousand kernel weight (TKW), and harvest index (HI). Under drought stress, spike length (SL) via TKW and HI, NT via number of spikes (NS) and HI, and TKW via HI had the greatest beneficial indirect effects. The fitted models of grain yield and its components under drought stress comprised biological yield (BYLD), NT, NS, HI, and plant height (PH), TKW, BYLD, HI, which contributed more to grain yield in the first and second seasons at 91.5% and 96.7%, respectively. According to the graphical genotype and environmental interaction (GGE-bioplot) focused scaling for comparison, G3 was the best and most promising genotype under these circumstances, followed by G6, G8, and G4. As a result, these genotypes are thought to be highly advantageous in wheat breeding studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Agronomy
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2026.1749285
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crop modeling and multivariate analysis of some bread wheat genotypes under drought stress

Nazih Y. Rebouh, Hala El-Sayed, Mohamed S. Shokr, Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa et al.
Frontiers in Agronomy
Genetics and Plant Breeding
article

Crop modeling and multivariate analysis of some bread wheat genotypes under drought stress

Nazih Y. Rebouh, Hala El-Sayed, Mohamed S. Shokr, Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa, Naheif E. Mohamed
article en

Abstract

One important abiotic factor affecting wheat yield and endangering global food security is drought stress. Thus, to evaluate these genotypes based on their water usage efficiency and drought susceptibility index, the current study used 10 extremely diverse bread wheat genotypes over the winter seasons of 2023/2024 and 2024/2025. Additionally, the correlation coefficients between grain yield and its components are broken down into direct and indirect impacts, and the fitted model for grain yield and its components in both normal and drought-stressed environments was evaluated. For every variable examined, there were very significant differences between the genotypes under both favorable and stressful conditions. The genotypes G3, G6, and G8, which are distinguished by a high yield index (YI: >1), low drought susceptibility index (<1), and high yielding stability index, were more adaptive in both environments. While genotypes G2 and G9 were suited to normal conditions in both seasons, genotypes G4 and G7 were adapted to drought stress. Grain yield was directly positively impacted by the characteristics of number of tillers (NT), thousand kernel weight (TKW), and harvest index (HI). Under drought stress, spike length (SL) via TKW and HI, NT via number of spikes (NS) and HI, and TKW via HI had the greatest beneficial indirect effects. The fitted models of grain yield and its components under drought stress comprised biological yield (BYLD), NT, NS, HI, and plant height (PH), TKW, BYLD, HI, which contributed more to grain yield in the first and second seasons at 91.5% and 96.7%, respectively. According to the graphical genotype and environmental interaction (GGE-bioplot) focused scaling for comparison, G3 was the best and most promising genotype under these circumstances, followed by G6, G8, and G4. As a result, these genotypes are thought to be highly advantageous in wheat breeding studies.

Frontiers in AgronomyVol. 8
Tanta University (EG), Institute of Environmental Engineering (PL), Agricultural Institute (HU), Sohag University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.