Outpatient presentation of ventricular fibrillation in paediatric left ventricular assist device patients: a case series with mechanistic insights

BACKGROUND: Ventricular fibrillation in paediatric recipients of left ventricular assist devices is rare but potentially fatal; however, because systemic perfusion may be temporarily maintained by the mechanical support, haemodynamic deterioration may be delayed, leading to underrecognition and presentation in the outpatient setting rather than as an immediate in-hospital emergency. METHODS: We report three paediatric left ventricular assist device recipients who developed outpatient malignant ventricular arrhythmias, each representing a distinct mechanistic category: structural, mechanical, and endocrine. Clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, and therapeutic responses were reviewed to highlight pathophysiologic heterogeneity and inform individualised management. RESULTS: The first patient, with biopsy-proven arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, experienced recurrent ventricular fibrillation refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic agents, ultimately requiring heart transplantation. The second patient presented with ventricular fibrillation secondary to mechanical suction and interventricular septal contact; defibrillation and left ventricular assist device speed reduction restored a stable rhythm with no recurrence. The third patient developed polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias during amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis and succumbed to refractory electrical storm and multi-organ failure despite intensive endocrine and antiarrhythmic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient ventricular fibrillation in paediatric left ventricular assist device recipients may result from diverse mechanisms, including myocardial structural disease, mechanical pump heart interaction, and systemic endocrine disturbances. Mechanism-guided management combining antiarrhythmic, mechanical, and metabolic interventions is essential for optimal outcomes. Continuous rhythm surveillance and readiness for immediate defibrillation are key to improving survival in this vulnerable group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cardiology in the Young
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951126112165
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Outpatient presentation of ventricular fibrillation in paediatric left ventricular assist device patients: a case series with mechanistic insights

Ertürk Levent, Osman Nuri Tuncer, Pınar YAZICI ÖZKAYA, Çağatay Engin et al.
Cardiology in the Young
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Outpatient presentation of ventricular fibrillation in paediatric left ventricular assist device patients: a case series with mechanistic insights

Ertürk Levent, Osman Nuri Tuncer, Pınar YAZICI ÖZKAYA, Çağatay Engin, Mustafa Özbaran, Yüksel Atay, Mehmet Baki Beyter, Eser Doğan, Burcu Büşra Acar Alkan, Hakan Kurt, Zülal Ülger Tutar, Meral Yılmaz, Tahir Yağdı, Burcugül Karasulu Beci, Şeyma Şebnem Ön
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular fibrillation in paediatric recipients of left ventricular assist devices is rare but potentially fatal; however, because systemic perfusion may be temporarily maintained by the mechanical support, haemodynamic deterioration may be delayed, leading to underrecognition and presentation in the outpatient setting rather than as an immediate in-hospital emergency. METHODS: We report three paediatric left ventricular assist device recipients who developed outpatient malignant ventricular arrhythmias, each representing a distinct mechanistic category: structural, mechanical, and endocrine. Clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, and therapeutic responses were reviewed to highlight pathophysiologic heterogeneity and inform individualised management. RESULTS: The first patient, with biopsy-proven arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia, experienced recurrent ventricular fibrillation refractory to multiple antiarrhythmic agents, ultimately requiring heart transplantation. The second patient presented with ventricular fibrillation secondary to mechanical suction and interventricular septal contact; defibrillation and left ventricular assist device speed reduction restored a stable rhythm with no recurrence. The third patient developed polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias during amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis and succumbed to refractory electrical storm and multi-organ failure despite intensive endocrine and antiarrhythmic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient ventricular fibrillation in paediatric left ventricular assist device recipients may result from diverse mechanisms, including myocardial structural disease, mechanical pump heart interaction, and systemic endocrine disturbances. Mechanism-guided management combining antiarrhythmic, mechanical, and metabolic interventions is essential for optimal outcomes. Continuous rhythm surveillance and readiness for immediate defibrillation are key to improving survival in this vulnerable group.

Cardiology in the Young
Ege University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.