Renal denervation: from establishing effectiveness to measuring success

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal denervation has emerged as a new therapeutic option for blood pressure (BP) control and is now incorporated into contemporary hypertension guidelines. Here, we review the evolution of evidence for renal denervation, approaches to assessing treatment response, and emerging technological developments. RECENT FINDINGS: Early non-sham-controlled trials of renal denervation showed substantial reductions in BP, whereas the first sham-controlled trial, SYMPLICITY HTN-3, yielded neutral findings. To address its limitations, subsequent trials incorporated key design modifications - including strict restriction of changes in background antihypertensive medications, procedural standardization, and separate conduct of trials in "on-medication" and "off-medication" cohorts - and have since consistently demonstrated the efficacy of renal denervation. In these studies, efficacy was assessed primarily by reductions in systolic BP, with additional measures including reductions in diastolic BP and antihypertensive medication burden. Alternative ablative mechanisms (e.g., alcohol-mediated neurolysis) are currently under investigation, along with multi-organ denervation approaches aimed at augmenting BP reduction while providing additional metabolic benefits. SUMMARY: Evidence supporting renal denervation has continued to accumulate, demonstrating consistent BP reductions. The field is evolving, with new approaches using alternative ablative mechanisms or targeting multi-organ sympathetic pathways on the horizon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hco.0000000000001299
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Renal denervation: from establishing effectiveness to measuring success

Hyeok‐Hee Lee, Eric A. Secemsky, Anna K. Krawisz
Current Opinion in Cardiology
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Renal denervation: from establishing effectiveness to measuring success

Hyeok‐Hee Lee, Eric A. Secemsky, Anna K. Krawisz
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Renal denervation has emerged as a new therapeutic option for blood pressure (BP) control and is now incorporated into contemporary hypertension guidelines. Here, we review the evolution of evidence for renal denervation, approaches to assessing treatment response, and emerging technological developments. RECENT FINDINGS: Early non-sham-controlled trials of renal denervation showed substantial reductions in BP, whereas the first sham-controlled trial, SYMPLICITY HTN-3, yielded neutral findings. To address its limitations, subsequent trials incorporated key design modifications - including strict restriction of changes in background antihypertensive medications, procedural standardization, and separate conduct of trials in "on-medication" and "off-medication" cohorts - and have since consistently demonstrated the efficacy of renal denervation. In these studies, efficacy was assessed primarily by reductions in systolic BP, with additional measures including reductions in diastolic BP and antihypertensive medication burden. Alternative ablative mechanisms (e.g., alcohol-mediated neurolysis) are currently under investigation, along with multi-organ denervation approaches aimed at augmenting BP reduction while providing additional metabolic benefits. SUMMARY: Evidence supporting renal denervation has continued to accumulate, demonstrating consistent BP reductions. The field is evolving, with new approaches using alternative ablative mechanisms or targeting multi-organ sympathetic pathways on the horizon.

Current Opinion in Cardiology
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.