Exploring the impact of <scp>SDS</scp> ‐modified <scp>ZnO</scp> – <scp> CeO <sub>2</sub> </scp> nanocomposites on photocatalytic degradation and antibacterial activity

Abstract The objective of this study is to develop an efficient photocatalyst for the elimination of detrimental organic pollutants from the contaminated water system. Sustainable textile effluent treatment necessitates approaches that proficiently eliminate pollutants, diminish costs, prevent secondary pollution, and permit water recycling. In this study, ZnO–CeO 2 and SDS‐modified ZnO–CeO 2 nanoparticles with varying morphologies and crystallite sizes were synthesized via a facile co‐precipitation method. The structural, morphological, and elemental characteristics of the prepared photocatalysts were systematically analyzed using XRD, FTIR, UV–Vis, EDX, and FE‐SEM. The average crystallite size of ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites (18.69 nm) compared to that of SDS/ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites (21.82 nm) suggests that the presence of the SDS surfactant negatively impacts the structural properties of the ZnO–CeO 2 photocatalyst. Consequently, the SDS‐modified binary oxides demonstrated lower photocatalytic degradation efficiency compared to the unmodified ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites. The reduced activity is owing to congested active sites, excessive SDS, and organic remains. EDX confirmed residual carbon from SDS on the surface, which caused light absorption and charge separation. The unmodified binary oxide achieved 97.16%, 72.04%, and 27.18% degradation of CIP, MB, and MO, while the SDS‐modified oxide reached 88.47%, 61.46%, and 17.61% within 210 min under UV light. The degradation kinetics followed a pseudo‐first‐order model, with hydroxyl radicals identified as the predominant reactive species governing the photodegradation process. Moreover, ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites demonstrated superior antibacterial activity against both Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria compared to the SDS‐treated nanocomposites. The study demonstrates ZnO–CeO 2 's combined photocatalytic and antibacterial performance, supporting its usage as a multifunctional material for effluent treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.70484
Primary Topic
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the impact of SDS ‐modified ZnO – CeO 2 nanocomposites on photocatalytic degradation and antibacterial activity

Mehejabin Nurunnahar, Md. Awlad Hossain, M. Nazim Uddin, Al Hakim et al.
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
article

Exploring the impact of SDS ‐modified ZnO – CeO 2 nanocomposites on photocatalytic degradation and antibacterial activity

Mehejabin Nurunnahar, Md. Awlad Hossain, M. Nazim Uddin, Al Hakim, Md Swapon Hossain, Md Elias, Pial Chowdhury
article en

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this study is to develop an efficient photocatalyst for the elimination of detrimental organic pollutants from the contaminated water system. Sustainable textile effluent treatment necessitates approaches that proficiently eliminate pollutants, diminish costs, prevent secondary pollution, and permit water recycling. In this study, ZnO–CeO 2 and SDS‐modified ZnO–CeO 2 nanoparticles with varying morphologies and crystallite sizes were synthesized via a facile co‐precipitation method. The structural, morphological, and elemental characteristics of the prepared photocatalysts were systematically analyzed using XRD, FTIR, UV–Vis, EDX, and FE‐SEM. The average crystallite size of ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites (18.69 nm) compared to that of SDS/ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites (21.82 nm) suggests that the presence of the SDS surfactant negatively impacts the structural properties of the ZnO–CeO 2 photocatalyst. Consequently, the SDS‐modified binary oxides demonstrated lower photocatalytic degradation efficiency compared to the unmodified ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites. The reduced activity is owing to congested active sites, excessive SDS, and organic remains. EDX confirmed residual carbon from SDS on the surface, which caused light absorption and charge separation. The unmodified binary oxide achieved 97.16%, 72.04%, and 27.18% degradation of CIP, MB, and MO, while the SDS‐modified oxide reached 88.47%, 61.46%, and 17.61% within 210 min under UV light. The degradation kinetics followed a pseudo‐first‐order model, with hydroxyl radicals identified as the predominant reactive species governing the photodegradation process. Moreover, ZnO–CeO 2 nanocomposites demonstrated superior antibacterial activity against both Gram‐positive and Gram‐negative bacteria compared to the SDS‐treated nanocomposites. The study demonstrates ZnO–CeO 2 's combined photocatalytic and antibacterial performance, supporting its usage as a multifunctional material for effluent treatment.

Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (BD), Jagannath University (BD), Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (BD)
Jagannath University
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.