Far from a Popular Movement: The National Defense Coup d'État in Thessaloniki, August–October 1916

Abstract: During the First World War, Greek society became sharply polarized around the figures of Liberal Party leader Eleftherios Venizelos, who supported intervention on the Allied side, and King Constantine, who favored neutrality. This rift, known as the National Schism, eventually resulted in the country's split in 1916–1917 with the formation of the pro-Allied "National Defense" regime in Thessaloniki while the official government in Athens remained neutral. The limited historiography on the National Defense putsch has generally prioritized high politics and diplomacy, disregarding the political dynamics on the ground in Thessaloniki and Greek Macedonia. A perspective "from below" shows that the coup enjoyed only modest popular support. The National Defense regime's unpopularity helps illuminate the later evolution of the National Schism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of modern Greek studies
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/mgs.2026.a988601
Primary Topic
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Far from a Popular Movement: The National Defense Coup d'État in Thessaloniki, August–October 1916

Arturo Zoffmann Rodríguez
Journal of modern Greek studies
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
article

Far from a Popular Movement: The National Defense Coup d'État in Thessaloniki, August–October 1916

Arturo Zoffmann Rodríguez
article en

Abstract

Abstract: During the First World War, Greek society became sharply polarized around the figures of Liberal Party leader Eleftherios Venizelos, who supported intervention on the Allied side, and King Constantine, who favored neutrality. This rift, known as the National Schism, eventually resulted in the country's split in 1916–1917 with the formation of the pro-Allied "National Defense" regime in Thessaloniki while the official government in Athens remained neutral. The limited historiography on the National Defense putsch has generally prioritized high politics and diplomacy, disregarding the political dynamics on the ground in Thessaloniki and Greek Macedonia. A perspective "from below" shows that the coup enjoyed only modest popular support. The National Defense regime's unpopularity helps illuminate the later evolution of the National Schism.

Journal of modern Greek studiesVol. 44(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.