Toward better technology for social health in dementia: a review of implementation recommendations and research priorities to equitably meet the demand

Background Social health is increasingly recognized as a key dimension of wellbeing in dementia, yet it remains unclear to what extent available assistive technologies are personalisable, usable, and effective in addressing related unmet needs. Objective This umbrella review aimed to (1) identify how many and which technologies are personalisable, usable and effective in supporting social health in dementia, and (2) synthesize recommendations from the current literature on how to improve equitable implementation. Methods An explorative review of reviews was conducted, including 28 reviews published between 2007 and 2024. The INDUCT/DISTINCT Best Practice Guidance for Human Interaction with Technology in Dementia was also included. Technologies and recommendations were analyzed using a combined frequency-based and thematic approach and categorized according to the three social health domains (fulfilling potential and obligations; managing life with some degree of independence; participation in social activities) and across micro-, meso-, and macrolevels. Results Of all technologies discussed, 48% were reported as personalisable and 59% as usable. However, only 23% of personalisable technologies demonstrated effectiveness in at least one randomized controlled trial. Most evidence related to the domain of managing life with some degree of independence, while fewer technologies showed demonstrated effectiveness for fulfilling potential or enhancing social participation. Recommendations primarily addressed implementation strategies, equity considerations, and stakeholder collaboration. Future research priorities included the development of needs-based, personalisable, and diversity-sensitive technologies, improved methodological rigor, and supportive policy and funding structures. Conclusions While half of the technologies are described as adaptable to user needs, preferences or abilities and more than half as usable, robust evidence for their effectiveness in promoting social health remains limited. Clearer operationalisation of personalisation, stronger evaluation designs and improved implementation strategies are needed to ensure that people with dementia can equitably access technologies that promote their social health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1767647
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward better technology for social health in dementia: a review of implementation recommendations and research priorities to equitably meet the demand

Sara Laureen Bartels, Rose‐Marie Dröes, Mauricio Molinari Ulate, David Neal et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Toward better technology for social health in dementia: a review of implementation recommendations and research priorities to equitably meet the demand

Sara Laureen Bartels, Rose‐Marie Dröes, Mauricio Molinari Ulate, David Neal, Joanna Rymaszewska, Angie A. Diaz-Baquero, Jochen René Thyrian, Manuel Franco-Martín, Dorota Szcześniak, Efrain David Rujano Vasques, Karin Wolf-Ostermann, Louise Hopper
article en

Abstract

Background Social health is increasingly recognized as a key dimension of wellbeing in dementia, yet it remains unclear to what extent available assistive technologies are personalisable, usable, and effective in addressing related unmet needs. Objective This umbrella review aimed to (1) identify how many and which technologies are personalisable, usable and effective in supporting social health in dementia, and (2) synthesize recommendations from the current literature on how to improve equitable implementation. Methods An explorative review of reviews was conducted, including 28 reviews published between 2007 and 2024. The INDUCT/DISTINCT Best Practice Guidance for Human Interaction with Technology in Dementia was also included. Technologies and recommendations were analyzed using a combined frequency-based and thematic approach and categorized according to the three social health domains (fulfilling potential and obligations; managing life with some degree of independence; participation in social activities) and across micro-, meso-, and macrolevels. Results Of all technologies discussed, 48% were reported as personalisable and 59% as usable. However, only 23% of personalisable technologies demonstrated effectiveness in at least one randomized controlled trial. Most evidence related to the domain of managing life with some degree of independence, while fewer technologies showed demonstrated effectiveness for fulfilling potential or enhancing social participation. Recommendations primarily addressed implementation strategies, equity considerations, and stakeholder collaboration. Future research priorities included the development of needs-based, personalisable, and diversity-sensitive technologies, improved methodological rigor, and supportive policy and funding structures. Conclusions While half of the technologies are described as adaptable to user needs, preferences or abilities and more than half as usable, robust evidence for their effectiveness in promoting social health remains limited. Clearer operationalisation of personalisation, stronger evaluation designs and improved implementation strategies are needed to ensure that people with dementia can equitably access technologies that promote their social health.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Transnational University Limburg (NL), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DE), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Institute of Public Health (AL), Society for Personality Assessment (US), Asociación Española de Psiquiatría del Niño y el Adolescente (ES), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Institute of Mental Health and Hospital (IN), Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.