Enhancing radiology workflows through collaborative AI-assisted chest X-ray reporting using large vision-language models: a proof-of-concept study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether collaborative assistance from an artificial intelligence-based tool that proposes partial radiology report content can improve reporting efficiency and radiologist satisfaction in chest X-ray interpretation, without compromising report quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, three radiologists reported 50 MIMIC-CXR chest X-rays twice, once with artificial intelligence (AI) assistance and once without. A specialized large vision-language model (LVLM) provided real-time suggestions, which could be accepted, modified or rejected. The study evaluated writing time, suggestion acceptance, report length and quality and assessed usability and suggestion quality on a 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire. Statistical analysis used paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests based on normality. RESULTS: AI assistance reduced mean writing time by 7.80% (p = 0.08), with significant gains for complex reports (18.34%, p < 0.001). Efficiency improvements correlated with suggestion acceptance and were user-dependent, with benefits up to 27.24% (CI: [17.34, 37.14], p < 0.001) for radiologists with high acceptance. Report quality and length remained stable, indicating preserved diagnostic accuracy without degradation. Radiologists rated the tool highly for ease of use (mean: 4.33) and desired regular use (mean: 4), noting minimal errors (mean: 1.67). CONCLUSION: Collaborative AI assistance with an LVLM can improve reporting efficiency if well adopted, particularly for complex cases, without compromising quality, and is well-received by radiologists. These exploratory findings suggest potential to optimize radiology workflows through collaborative reporting and warrant prospective validation in clinical settings. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically evaluates a collaborative AI-assisted reporting tool for chest X-rays, demonstrating its potential to enhance radiologist efficiency without compromising automatically measured report quality, thereby demonstrating a potential path for practical integration of AI into clinical radiology workflows. KEY POINTS: A collaborative vision-language model supported radiology workflow is proposed, and its effectiveness is studied in a user study. Mean writing time for a radiology report decreases with AI support without affecting report quality. The AI-assisted tool was rated highly for usability and integration into clinical workflow, supporting its practical adoption in radiology reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insights into Imaging
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-026-02292-7
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing radiology workflows through collaborative AI-assisted chest X-ray reporting using large vision-language models: a proof-of-concept study

Florian T. Gassert, Chantal Pellegrini, Ege Özsoy, Maximilian Strenzke et al.
Insights into Imaging
Radiology practices and education
article

Enhancing radiology workflows through collaborative AI-assisted chest X-ray reporting using large vision-language models: a proof-of-concept study

Florian T. Gassert, Chantal Pellegrini, Ege Özsoy, Maximilian Strenzke, M Makowski, A W Marka, Matthias Keicher, Nassir Navab
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether collaborative assistance from an artificial intelligence-based tool that proposes partial radiology report content can improve reporting efficiency and radiologist satisfaction in chest X-ray interpretation, without compromising report quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study, three radiologists reported 50 MIMIC-CXR chest X-rays twice, once with artificial intelligence (AI) assistance and once without. A specialized large vision-language model (LVLM) provided real-time suggestions, which could be accepted, modified or rejected. The study evaluated writing time, suggestion acceptance, report length and quality and assessed usability and suggestion quality on a 5-point Likert-scale questionnaire. Statistical analysis used paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests based on normality. RESULTS: AI assistance reduced mean writing time by 7.80% (p = 0.08), with significant gains for complex reports (18.34%, p < 0.001). Efficiency improvements correlated with suggestion acceptance and were user-dependent, with benefits up to 27.24% (CI: [17.34, 37.14], p < 0.001) for radiologists with high acceptance. Report quality and length remained stable, indicating preserved diagnostic accuracy without degradation. Radiologists rated the tool highly for ease of use (mean: 4.33) and desired regular use (mean: 4), noting minimal errors (mean: 1.67). CONCLUSION: Collaborative AI assistance with an LVLM can improve reporting efficiency if well adopted, particularly for complex cases, without compromising quality, and is well-received by radiologists. These exploratory findings suggest potential to optimize radiology workflows through collaborative reporting and warrant prospective validation in clinical settings. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study critically evaluates a collaborative AI-assisted reporting tool for chest X-rays, demonstrating its potential to enhance radiologist efficiency without compromising automatically measured report quality, thereby demonstrating a potential path for practical integration of AI into clinical radiology workflows. KEY POINTS: A collaborative vision-language model supported radiology workflow is proposed, and its effectiveness is studied in a user study. Mean writing time for a radiology report decreases with AI support without affecting report quality. The AI-assisted tool was rated highly for usability and integration into clinical workflow, supporting its practical adoption in radiology reporting.

Insights into ImagingVol. 17(1)
TUM Klinikum (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.