Evaluation of lunar soil sampling disturbance based on penetration resistance method

Introduction To investigate the impact of surface sampling operations on the physical and mechanical properties of lunar soil—defined as the granular, sub-centimeter-sized fraction of the lunar regolith—and to mitigate design errors in sampling missions that arise from neglecting such disturbance, we conducted sampling disturbance experiments using the CUG-1A lunar soil simulant. Methods The degree of lunar soil disturbance was evaluated based on the change in penetration resistance of a standard probe inserted into the soil before and after sampling. Results The experimental results indicate that the bucket width, sampling depth, sampling speed, and (for shovelling) the entry angle all significantly affect the disturbance degree. Discussion The shovelling action, a linear penetration-and-lift operation, predominantly induces a compaction effect on the lunar soil simulant. In contrast, the digging action, an arcuate scooping operation, causes compaction during the initial phase but generates a distinct loosening effect at the motion endpoint. The parameter combination that minimizes disturbance for the shovelling experiment is a bucket width of 4 cm, sampling depth of 2 cm, speed of 50 mm/s, and entry angle of 45°. For the digging experiment, the optimal combination is a bucket width of 4 cm, sampling depth of 3.5 cm, and speed of 50 mm/s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2026.1788224
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of lunar soil sampling disturbance based on penetration resistance method

Lan-Lan Xie, Qian Li, Jia-Hang Lv, Ding-Kun Hu
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
article

Evaluation of lunar soil sampling disturbance based on penetration resistance method

Lan-Lan Xie, Qian Li, Jia-Hang Lv, Ding-Kun Hu
article en

Abstract

Introduction To investigate the impact of surface sampling operations on the physical and mechanical properties of lunar soil—defined as the granular, sub-centimeter-sized fraction of the lunar regolith—and to mitigate design errors in sampling missions that arise from neglecting such disturbance, we conducted sampling disturbance experiments using the CUG-1A lunar soil simulant. Methods The degree of lunar soil disturbance was evaluated based on the change in penetration resistance of a standard probe inserted into the soil before and after sampling. Results The experimental results indicate that the bucket width, sampling depth, sampling speed, and (for shovelling) the entry angle all significantly affect the disturbance degree. Discussion The shovelling action, a linear penetration-and-lift operation, predominantly induces a compaction effect on the lunar soil simulant. In contrast, the digging action, an arcuate scooping operation, causes compaction during the initial phase but generates a distinct loosening effect at the motion endpoint. The parameter combination that minimizes disturbance for the shovelling experiment is a bucket width of 4 cm, sampling depth of 2 cm, speed of 50 mm/s, and entry angle of 45°. For the digging experiment, the optimal combination is a bucket width of 4 cm, sampling depth of 3.5 cm, and speed of 50 mm/s.

Frontiers in Astronomy and Space SciencesVol. 13
Chengdu University of Technology (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.