Systematic Framework for Interpreting Laboratory-Confirmed Infectious Disease Surveillance Data: A Pragmatic Scenario-Based Approach

In infectious disease surveillance, laboratory-confirmed case counts and test positivity (proportion of tests positive for the target pathogen) are commonly used to monitor disease activity. However, these test-based data are affected not only by disease incidence but also by testing intensity, often making interpretations difficult. To help address this challenge, we present a generalizable, systematic framework that considers the number of tests performed, number of test-positive counts, and test positivity. With explicit consideration of ascertainment bias, we explain why all 3 indicators should be used to improve data interpretation, situational assessment, and communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Security
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094261435869
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic Framework for Interpreting Laboratory-Confirmed Infectious Disease Surveillance Data: A Pragmatic Scenario-Based Approach

Osamu Takahara, Katsuhiro Komase, Yuuki Tsuchihashi, Kazuhiko Kanou et al.
Health Security
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
article

Systematic Framework for Interpreting Laboratory-Confirmed Infectious Disease Surveillance Data: A Pragmatic Scenario-Based Approach

Osamu Takahara, Katsuhiro Komase, Yuuki Tsuchihashi, Kazuhiko Kanou, Takeshi Arashiro, Reiko Shimbashi, Ayu Kasamatsu, Hirofumi Kato, Yusuke Kobayashi, Taro Kamigaki, Takuri Takahashi, Tamano Matsui, Yuzo Arima, Motoi Suzuki
article en

Abstract

In infectious disease surveillance, laboratory-confirmed case counts and test positivity (proportion of tests positive for the target pathogen) are commonly used to monitor disease activity. However, these test-based data are affected not only by disease incidence but also by testing intensity, often making interpretations difficult. To help address this challenge, we present a generalizable, systematic framework that considers the number of tests performed, number of test-positive counts, and test positivity. With explicit consideration of ascertainment bias, we explain why all 3 indicators should be used to improve data interpretation, situational assessment, and communication.

Health Security
Public Health Dayton & Montgomery County (US)
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.