High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Metabolomic Profiling of IDH-Wild-Type Glioblastoma Reveals a Composite Surgical Sampling Signature Shaped by Clinical and Anatomical Tumor Features

Background/Objectives: Tissue-based metabolomic readouts in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma may be strongly shaped by how tumor tissue is surgically accessed and sampled. We aimed to determine whether, and to what extent, surgical sampling context structures the HRMAS metabolic landscape, and to disentangle sampling-related contributions from clinico-anatomical confounders. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with de novo IDH-wild-type glioblastoma (35 biopsy-only, 64 resection: 40 gross-total, 21 near-total, 3 subtotal), yielding 166 HRMAS spectra and 47 quantified metabolites (nmol/mg). Patient-level profiles were compared using PCA, metabolite-wise testing, pathway-level aggregation (10 pathways), and variance partitioning by PERMANOVA, both unadjusted and adjusted for age, WHO PS, deep-seated location, midline involvement, multifocality, MGMT methylation, and eloquent area. Sensitivity analyses included clinico-anatomically restricted subgroups, 15 canonical metabolite ratios, and Probabilistic Quotient Normalization. Intratumoral heterogeneity was assessed in 44 multi-sampled patients. Results: Biopsy-only and resection-derived cases separated along PC1 in unsupervised PCA (62.6% variance; p < 0.001), with 42/47 metabolites differing after FDR correction. However, the surgical group explained only 2.6% of the total variance (PERMANOVA p = 0.026), and this share was no longer significant after confounder adjustment (p = 0.39). Clinico-anatomical restriction progressively attenuated the effect (42/47 → 1/47 significant metabolites). Ratio-based and PQN analyses showed a residual compositional difference beyond scaling (13/15 ratios; 16/47 metabolites). Intratumoral heterogeneity was greater in resections and preserved in an n-matched analysis (p = 0.020). Conclusions: The apparent biopsy-versus-resection metabolic difference is largely a composite signal reflecting clinico-anatomical patient selection with a smaller tissue-composition contribution. Biopsy-only and resection-derived specimens should not be pooled uncritically in tissue-based metabolomic studies of glioblastoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metabolites
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo16050296
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Metabolomic Profiling of IDH-Wild-Type Glioblastoma Reveals a Composite Surgical Sampling Signature Shaped by Clinical and Anatomical Tumor Features

Caroline Bund, H. Cébula, Hassiba Outilaft, Julien Todeschi et al.
Metabolites
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

High-Resolution Magic Angle Spinning Metabolomic Profiling of IDH-Wild-Type Glioblastoma Reveals a Composite Surgical Sampling Signature Shaped by Clinical and Anatomical Tumor Features

Caroline Bund, H. Cébula, Hassiba Outilaft, Julien Todeschi, Izzie-Jacques Namer
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Tissue-based metabolomic readouts in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma may be strongly shaped by how tumor tissue is surgically accessed and sampled. We aimed to determine whether, and to what extent, surgical sampling context structures the HRMAS metabolic landscape, and to disentangle sampling-related contributions from clinico-anatomical confounders. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients with de novo IDH-wild-type glioblastoma (35 biopsy-only, 64 resection: 40 gross-total, 21 near-total, 3 subtotal), yielding 166 HRMAS spectra and 47 quantified metabolites (nmol/mg). Patient-level profiles were compared using PCA, metabolite-wise testing, pathway-level aggregation (10 pathways), and variance partitioning by PERMANOVA, both unadjusted and adjusted for age, WHO PS, deep-seated location, midline involvement, multifocality, MGMT methylation, and eloquent area. Sensitivity analyses included clinico-anatomically restricted subgroups, 15 canonical metabolite ratios, and Probabilistic Quotient Normalization. Intratumoral heterogeneity was assessed in 44 multi-sampled patients. Results: Biopsy-only and resection-derived cases separated along PC1 in unsupervised PCA (62.6% variance; p < 0.001), with 42/47 metabolites differing after FDR correction. However, the surgical group explained only 2.6% of the total variance (PERMANOVA p = 0.026), and this share was no longer significant after confounder adjustment (p = 0.39). Clinico-anatomical restriction progressively attenuated the effect (42/47 → 1/47 significant metabolites). Ratio-based and PQN analyses showed a residual compositional difference beyond scaling (13/15 ratios; 16/47 metabolites). Intratumoral heterogeneity was greater in resections and preserved in an n-matched analysis (p = 0.020). Conclusions: The apparent biopsy-versus-resection metabolic difference is largely a composite signal reflecting clinico-anatomical patient selection with a smaller tissue-composition contribution. Biopsy-only and resection-derived specimens should not be pooled uncritically in tissue-based metabolomic studies of glioblastoma.

MetabolitesVol. 16(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut d'Imagerie Biomédicale (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.