AI in Robot Manipulator Control: A Systematic Review

This study presents a PRISMA-based systematic review of 343 publications focused on tracking how AI-based methods have evolved within robot manipulator control from 2015 to 2025. The review examines how AI has been incorporated into the control pipeline by organizing prior work according to functional roles, including perception and estimation, planning, learning-based control, interaction and safety, and learning and adaptation. In addition to this functional taxonomy, the study analyzes publication growth, application domains, robot types, evaluation settings, and methodological patterns to characterize the evolution of the field over the past decade. The results show that research activity has been concentrated primarily in learning control, while other functional roles have received comparatively less attention. The data also reveals an uneven distribution across application areas and robot platforms in the literature, with a strong reliance on simulation and limited evidence of integrated real-world deployment. These patterns indicate that, despite rapid growth and methodological diversity, the field remains imbalanced in both research focus and validation maturity. Rather than summarizing individual studies in isolation, this review provides a high-level perspective on where effort has been concentrated, where major gaps persist, and which directions are most critical for advancing AI-based robot manipulator control toward reliable and scalable real-world use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14091401
Primary Topic
Robot Manipulation and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI in Robot Manipulator Control: A Systematic Review

Tu T. C. Duong, Thuy Nguyen, Charles C. Nguyen, Ha T. T. Ngo et al.
Processes
Robot Manipulation and Learning
article

AI in Robot Manipulator Control: A Systematic Review

Tu T. C. Duong, Thuy Nguyen, Charles C. Nguyen, Ha T. T. Ngo, Tri T. Nguyen, Lu Sun
article en

Abstract

This study presents a PRISMA-based systematic review of 343 publications focused on tracking how AI-based methods have evolved within robot manipulator control from 2015 to 2025. The review examines how AI has been incorporated into the control pipeline by organizing prior work according to functional roles, including perception and estimation, planning, learning-based control, interaction and safety, and learning and adaptation. In addition to this functional taxonomy, the study analyzes publication growth, application domains, robot types, evaluation settings, and methodological patterns to characterize the evolution of the field over the past decade. The results show that research activity has been concentrated primarily in learning control, while other functional roles have received comparatively less attention. The data also reveals an uneven distribution across application areas and robot platforms in the literature, with a strong reliance on simulation and limited evidence of integrated real-world deployment. These patterns indicate that, despite rapid growth and methodological diversity, the field remains imbalanced in both research focus and validation maturity. Rather than summarizing individual studies in isolation, this review provides a high-level perspective on where effort has been concentrated, where major gaps persist, and which directions are most critical for advancing AI-based robot manipulator control toward reliable and scalable real-world use.

ProcessesVol. 14(9)
Amazon (United States) (US), Rochester Institute of Technology (US), University of America (US), University of Da Nang (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology and Engineering (VN), Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (VN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Robot Manipulation and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.