A Comparative Study of Tin Electrorefining in Molten LiCl–KCl–CaCl₂: Experimental Two-Electrode Current Control and Theoretical Three-Electrode Potential Control

Molten salt electrorefining is a mature technology for metal recovery, yet conventional current‑controlled, two‑electrode operation provides limited electrochemical selectivity and restricted insight into electrode‑specific behavior. In this work, a simplified model is developed to compare current‑controlled two‑electrode electrorefining data with a potential‑controlled three‑electrode electrorefining simulation using tin in molten LiCl–KCl–CaCl₂ as a surrogate for plutonium processing. The model examines anodic and cathodic limitations under fixed‑potential operation and evaluates implications for selectivity, efficiency, and runtime relative to experimentally demonstrated two‑electrode performance. Results indicate that independent potential control enables operation closer to thermodynamic selectivity limits, with the potential to suppress impurity oxidation and co‑deposition. However, cathodic mass‑transfer limitations are predicted to constrain throughput, leading to longer runtimes compared to current‑controlled operation. These findings highlight a fundamental tradeoff between selectivity and throughput and establish a quantitative framework for assessing the viability of three‑electrode control strategies in molten salt electrorefining systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reviews, analyses, and instructional studies in electrochemistry.
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70163/2997-8947.1011
Primary Topic
Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of Tin Electrorefining in Molten LiCl–KCl–CaCl₂: Experimental Two-Electrode Current Control and Theoretical Three-Electrode Potential Control

Bryant Johnson, George Ankrah, Ander Fuller, Devin Rappleye
Reviews, analyses, and instructional studies in electrochemistry.
Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
article

A Comparative Study of Tin Electrorefining in Molten LiCl–KCl–CaCl₂: Experimental Two-Electrode Current Control and Theoretical Three-Electrode Potential Control

Bryant Johnson, George Ankrah, Ander Fuller, Devin Rappleye
article en

Abstract

Molten salt electrorefining is a mature technology for metal recovery, yet conventional current‑controlled, two‑electrode operation provides limited electrochemical selectivity and restricted insight into electrode‑specific behavior. In this work, a simplified model is developed to compare current‑controlled two‑electrode electrorefining data with a potential‑controlled three‑electrode electrorefining simulation using tin in molten LiCl–KCl–CaCl₂ as a surrogate for plutonium processing. The model examines anodic and cathodic limitations under fixed‑potential operation and evaluates implications for selectivity, efficiency, and runtime relative to experimentally demonstrated two‑electrode performance. Results indicate that independent potential control enables operation closer to thermodynamic selectivity limits, with the potential to suppress impurity oxidation and co‑deposition. However, cathodic mass‑transfer limitations are predicted to constrain throughput, leading to longer runtimes compared to current‑controlled operation. These findings highlight a fundamental tradeoff between selectivity and throughput and establish a quantitative framework for assessing the viability of three‑electrode control strategies in molten salt electrorefining systems.

Reviews, analyses, and instructional studies in electrochemistry.Vol. 3(1)
Brigham Young University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.