Measuring children's active travel - reliability and validity of participatory mapping method against accelerometry

Examining children's active travel and related associations with health and sustainability outcomes requires valid, accurate and reliable measures. Prevalent methods such as self-report physical activity questionnaires and accelerometers are validated tools for assessing physical activity and active travel, but alone ill-fitting for assessing environmental level effects on active travel. Geospatial technologies offer possibilities for capturing environmental exposure and active travel concurrently. We investigated the reliability and the validity of a participatory mapping method in capturing children's active travel. Weekly active school travel of 10- to 12-year-old children (n = 406 in 2020 and 440 in 2021) living in two mid-sized cities in Finland were measured using participatory mapping (Maptionnaire®) and accelerometer (Fibion®). Participatory mapping had moderate reliability for measuring school journey distance (ICC = 0.73) and walking to school (ICC = 0.56), cycling to school (ICC = 0.45), and total active school travel (ICC = 0.55) duration. We found differences between the participatory mapping measured median weekly total active travel (2.07 [IQR 1.34; 3.03]), walking (1.70 [IQR 1.22; 3.03]) and cycling (2.20 [IQR 1.46; 3.01]) duration and accelerometer measured active travel (1.47 [IQR 0.97; 1.99]), walking (1.17 [IQR 0.81; 1.83]) and cycling (1.63 [IQR 1.06; 2.06]) duration. While all the median weekly active travel duration differences were close to 0.5 weekly hours, further analysis showed that the average time differences [lower LoA, upper LoA] were +0.83 h/week [0.66, 1.00] for total active travel to school, +1.07 h/week [0.63, 1.52] for walking to school, and +0.76 h/week [0.58, 0.93] for cycling to school. Participatory mapping serves as a potential method for examining active travel when spatial, experiential and behavioural aspects of active travel are to be considered concurrently. Future research focusing on environmental aspects of active travel and physical activity should consider spatially referenced methods such as participatory mapping alongside other methods. • Public Participatory GIS (PPGIS) method captures environmental effects of active travel. • PPGIS serves as a potential tool for longitudinal health-place research. • PPGIS can provide in-depth data on active travel when large samples are needed. • PPGIS tends to slightly overestimate active travel duration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Transport & Health
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2026.102328
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring children's active travel - reliability and validity of participatory mapping method against accelerometry

Tiina Rinne, Samad Esmaeilzadeh, Pirjo Hakala, Arto J. Pesola et al.
Journal of Transport & Health
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Measuring children's active travel - reliability and validity of participatory mapping method against accelerometry

Tiina Rinne, Samad Esmaeilzadeh, Pirjo Hakala, Arto J. Pesola, Päivi Berg
article en

Abstract

Examining children's active travel and related associations with health and sustainability outcomes requires valid, accurate and reliable measures. Prevalent methods such as self-report physical activity questionnaires and accelerometers are validated tools for assessing physical activity and active travel, but alone ill-fitting for assessing environmental level effects on active travel. Geospatial technologies offer possibilities for capturing environmental exposure and active travel concurrently. We investigated the reliability and the validity of a participatory mapping method in capturing children's active travel. Weekly active school travel of 10- to 12-year-old children (n = 406 in 2020 and 440 in 2021) living in two mid-sized cities in Finland were measured using participatory mapping (Maptionnaire®) and accelerometer (Fibion®). Participatory mapping had moderate reliability for measuring school journey distance (ICC = 0.73) and walking to school (ICC = 0.56), cycling to school (ICC = 0.45), and total active school travel (ICC = 0.55) duration. We found differences between the participatory mapping measured median weekly total active travel (2.07 [IQR 1.34; 3.03]), walking (1.70 [IQR 1.22; 3.03]) and cycling (2.20 [IQR 1.46; 3.01]) duration and accelerometer measured active travel (1.47 [IQR 0.97; 1.99]), walking (1.17 [IQR 0.81; 1.83]) and cycling (1.63 [IQR 1.06; 2.06]) duration. While all the median weekly active travel duration differences were close to 0.5 weekly hours, further analysis showed that the average time differences [lower LoA, upper LoA] were +0.83 h/week [0.66, 1.00] for total active travel to school, +1.07 h/week [0.63, 1.52] for walking to school, and +0.76 h/week [0.58, 0.93] for cycling to school. Participatory mapping serves as a potential method for examining active travel when spatial, experiential and behavioural aspects of active travel are to be considered concurrently. Future research focusing on environmental aspects of active travel and physical activity should consider spatially referenced methods such as participatory mapping alongside other methods. • Public Participatory GIS (PPGIS) method captures environmental effects of active travel. • PPGIS serves as a potential tool for longitudinal health-place research. • PPGIS can provide in-depth data on active travel when large samples are needed. • PPGIS tends to slightly overestimate active travel duration.

Journal of Transport & HealthVol. 49
University of Helsinki (FI), Finland University (FI), Tampere University (FI)
Academy of Finland, Opetus- ja Kulttuuriministeriö
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.