Prognostic Impact of Carvedilol vs. Metoprolol on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background: Evidence regarding potential agent-specific differences among β-blockers in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) remains limited. Objective: The present study sought to investigate the association of metoprolol versus carvedilol prescribed at hospital discharge with 30-month all-cause mortality and HF-related rehospitalization, and to explore potential effect modification by atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF between 2016 and 2022 were included. Exposure was β-blocker therapy at discharge (metoprolol succinate or carvedilol). Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates, multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching. Results: Among 2109 patients discharged alive, 1625 (77.5%) received β-blockers (metoprolol n = 1033; carvedilol n = 283). Carvedilol recipients were younger (median 72 vs. 76 years) and more frequently had prior heart failure (44.2% vs. 33.2%). Thirty-month mortality occurred in 25.5% of metoprolol-treated and 31.8% of carvedilol-treated patients (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.98; p = 0.031). This association was observed in patients without AF, but not in those with AF. After multivariable adjustments, the association remained directionally similar (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58–1.00). In the matched cohort (n = 246 per group), metoprolol was still associated with lower mortality (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.93; p = 0.017). By contrast, HF-related rehospitalization did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions: In this observational HFmrEF cohort, treatment with metoprolol at index hospital discharge was associated with lower 30-month mortality compared with carvedilol. Given the observational study design in line with the higher burden of comorbidities in patients discharged on carvedilol, further prospective studies are needed to clarify the impact of different β-blocker types in heart failure patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15093347
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Impact of Carvedilol vs. Metoprolol on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

Marielen Reinhardt, Felix Lau, Henning Johann Steffen, Noah Abel et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Prognostic Impact of Carvedilol vs. Metoprolol on Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction

Marielen Reinhardt, Felix Lau, Henning Johann Steffen, Noah Abel, K Weidner, Alexander Schmitt, Michael Behnes, Mohammad Abumayyaleh, Tobias Schupp, Svetlana Hetjens, Ibrahim Akin
article en

Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding potential agent-specific differences among β-blockers in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) remains limited. Objective: The present study sought to investigate the association of metoprolol versus carvedilol prescribed at hospital discharge with 30-month all-cause mortality and HF-related rehospitalization, and to explore potential effect modification by atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF between 2016 and 2022 were included. Exposure was β-blocker therapy at discharge (metoprolol succinate or carvedilol). Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier estimates, multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching. Results: Among 2109 patients discharged alive, 1625 (77.5%) received β-blockers (metoprolol n = 1033; carvedilol n = 283). Carvedilol recipients were younger (median 72 vs. 76 years) and more frequently had prior heart failure (44.2% vs. 33.2%). Thirty-month mortality occurred in 25.5% of metoprolol-treated and 31.8% of carvedilol-treated patients (unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.98; p = 0.031). This association was observed in patients without AF, but not in those with AF. After multivariable adjustments, the association remained directionally similar (adjusted HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58–1.00). In the matched cohort (n = 246 per group), metoprolol was still associated with lower mortality (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.93; p = 0.017). By contrast, HF-related rehospitalization did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions: In this observational HFmrEF cohort, treatment with metoprolol at index hospital discharge was associated with lower 30-month mortality compared with carvedilol. Given the observational study design in line with the higher burden of comorbidities in patients discharged on carvedilol, further prospective studies are needed to clarify the impact of different β-blocker types in heart failure patients.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(9)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.