Assessment of canal centering and dentinal integrity following root canal preparation with different NiTi file systems: An in vitro CBCT and stereomicroscopic study

The success of root canal treatment largely depends on the canal shaping procedure, which influences subsequent steps, such as cleaning, obturation, and sealing. The present study aimed to evaluate the canal-centering ability, dentin removal, and dentinal crack incidence following root canal preparation with different rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a stereomicroscope. Forty freshly extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars were selected and scanned preoperatively by CBCT (KAVO OP 3D Pro, Germany) to evaluate canal curvature. The samples were then randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 10): Group 1 - ProTaper Next (continuous rotary), Group 2 - MicroMega One RECI (reciprocating), Group 3 - Race Evo (continuous rotary), and Group 4 - R-Motion (reciprocating). Root canals were prepared in accordance with the respective manufacturer's recommendations. Post-instrumentation CBCT scans were obtained to assess canal centering and remaining dentin thickness at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex. Root sections were also examined under a stereomicroscope to assess dentinal cracks. The MicroMega One RECI (Group 2) demonstrated superior canal centering, with mean ratios of 0.20 ± 0.05, 0.18 ± 0.04, and 0.17 ± 0.03 in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds, respectively. In contrast, ProTaper Next (Group 1) showed the highest centering ratio (0.35 ± 0.08 at 3 mm), indicating greater deviation from the canal axis. Reciprocating systems exhibited better dentin preservation and fewer dentinal cracks compared with continuous rotary systems. Based on observations from this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the variations in design of file systems and motion patterns critically determine the efficiency and safety of root canal shaping. Reciprocating and rotary motions show different effects on canal centering, dentin removal, crack propagation, and the preservation of root integrity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000048483
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of canal centering and dentinal integrity following root canal preparation with different NiTi file systems: An in vitro CBCT and stereomicroscopic study

Suheel Manzoor Baba, Johari Yap Abdullah, Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani, Mohammed Alqarni et al.
Medicine
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Assessment of canal centering and dentinal integrity following root canal preparation with different NiTi file systems: An in vitro CBCT and stereomicroscopic study

Suheel Manzoor Baba, Johari Yap Abdullah, Nik Rozainah Nik Abdul Ghani, Mohammed Alqarni, Shabina Shafi
article en

Abstract

The success of root canal treatment largely depends on the canal shaping procedure, which influences subsequent steps, such as cleaning, obturation, and sealing. The present study aimed to evaluate the canal-centering ability, dentin removal, and dentinal crack incidence following root canal preparation with different rotary and reciprocating nickel-titanium file systems using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a stereomicroscope. Forty freshly extracted single-rooted human mandibular premolars were selected and scanned preoperatively by CBCT (KAVO OP 3D Pro, Germany) to evaluate canal curvature. The samples were then randomly distributed into 4 groups (n = 10): Group 1 - ProTaper Next (continuous rotary), Group 2 - MicroMega One RECI (reciprocating), Group 3 - Race Evo (continuous rotary), and Group 4 - R-Motion (reciprocating). Root canals were prepared in accordance with the respective manufacturer's recommendations. Post-instrumentation CBCT scans were obtained to assess canal centering and remaining dentin thickness at 3, 6, and 9 mm from the apex. Root sections were also examined under a stereomicroscope to assess dentinal cracks. The MicroMega One RECI (Group 2) demonstrated superior canal centering, with mean ratios of 0.20 ± 0.05, 0.18 ± 0.04, and 0.17 ± 0.03 in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds, respectively. In contrast, ProTaper Next (Group 1) showed the highest centering ratio (0.35 ± 0.08 at 3 mm), indicating greater deviation from the canal axis. Reciprocating systems exhibited better dentin preservation and fewer dentinal cracks compared with continuous rotary systems. Based on observations from this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the variations in design of file systems and motion patterns critically determine the efficiency and safety of root canal shaping. Reciprocating and rotary motions show different effects on canal centering, dentin removal, crack propagation, and the preservation of root integrity.

MedicineVol. 105(17)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.