Unpacking cerumen impaction: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to support the development of the world health organization package of ear and hearing care interventions

Abstract Background Cerumen impaction is a common, preventable cause of hearing loss that affects up to 30% of the global population. Despite its high burden, management practices vary widely, highlighting the need for comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines. This systematic review was conducted to inform the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Package for Ear and Hearing Care Interventions (PEHCI) by identifying and appraising high-quality clinical practice guidelines for cerumen impaction. Methods A comprehensive search of bibliographic databases, guideline repositories, and organizational websites was conducted in August 2024. Guidelines published from 2014 onward were screened using predefined criteria. Eligible guidelines were assessed for quality using the AGREE II tool. Data were extracted using a standardized form based on the RIGHT checklist. Results Out of 74 initially identified articles, two met all inclusion criteria and demonstrated sufficient quality: one developed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS; total AGREE II score = 56.5) and the other by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE; total AGREE II score = 62.5). Both guidelines emphasized patient education, symptom- and examination-based diagnosis, and use of cerumenolytics, irrigation, and manual removal for treatment. NICE discouraged manual syringes due to safety concerns, while AAO-HNS considered them a safe and acceptable treatment option when performed appropriately. Conclusion This review highlights consistent, high-quality recommendations for cerumen impaction management and identifies areas of divergence relevant to global implementation. Findings will guide inclusion of cerumen impaction interventions in the WHO PEHCI and support the development of standardized, context-adaptable ear and hearing care services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Primary Care
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03325-2
Primary Topic
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking cerumen impaction: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to support the development of the world health organization package of ear and hearing care interventions

Mary Jue Xu, Pallavi Mishra, Peter Kfoury, Keshav Shah et al.
BMC Primary Care
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
article

Unpacking cerumen impaction: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to support the development of the world health organization package of ear and hearing care interventions

Mary Jue Xu, Pallavi Mishra, Peter Kfoury, Keshav Shah, Carolina Der, Rolvix H. Patterson, Lauren K. Dillard
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cerumen impaction is a common, preventable cause of hearing loss that affects up to 30% of the global population. Despite its high burden, management practices vary widely, highlighting the need for comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines. This systematic review was conducted to inform the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Package for Ear and Hearing Care Interventions (PEHCI) by identifying and appraising high-quality clinical practice guidelines for cerumen impaction. Methods A comprehensive search of bibliographic databases, guideline repositories, and organizational websites was conducted in August 2024. Guidelines published from 2014 onward were screened using predefined criteria. Eligible guidelines were assessed for quality using the AGREE II tool. Data were extracted using a standardized form based on the RIGHT checklist. Results Out of 74 initially identified articles, two met all inclusion criteria and demonstrated sufficient quality: one developed by the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS; total AGREE II score = 56.5) and the other by the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE; total AGREE II score = 62.5). Both guidelines emphasized patient education, symptom- and examination-based diagnosis, and use of cerumenolytics, irrigation, and manual removal for treatment. NICE discouraged manual syringes due to safety concerns, while AAO-HNS considered them a safe and acceptable treatment option when performed appropriately. Conclusion This review highlights consistent, high-quality recommendations for cerumen impaction management and identifies areas of divergence relevant to global implementation. Findings will guide inclusion of cerumen impaction interventions in the WHO PEHCI and support the development of standardized, context-adaptable ear and hearing care services.

BMC Primary CareVol. 27(1)
Medical University of South Carolina (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Utah (US), World Health Organization (CH), Center for Global Health (US), Global Initiative on Psychiatry (GE), University of Pennsylvania (US)
World Health Organization
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.