Expectations and realities in primary care appointment access in the United States: A national study

OBJECTIVE: While patients expect timely appointments, little is known about how accurately patient expectations reflect the realities of access to a primary care physician. METHODS: We deployed a national survey (N = 6119, conducted in 2021) to measure patient expectations and a separate national field experiment (N = 11,016, conducted between 2013 and 2016) where trained research assistants called physician offices seeking an appointment to measure physician availability. RESULTS: Using multivariate regression analyses, we find that patients expected to call 1.9 physicians to secure an appointment, consistent with an appointment offer rate of 49%. However, expectations of 5.4 days wait to an appointment were below the 28.5 wait days offered. Male respondents expected to wait 1.9 days longer and were offered appointments 2.0 days later. However, despite not expecting fewer appointments, Black and Hispanic patients were 2 percentage points and 3 percentage points less likely to be offered appointments, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents on average were able to accurately characterize overall primary care appointment access, but were unable to accurately describe how long one has to wait until being seen by a physician. Discrepancies between expectations and access in primary care may lead to low patient satisfaction, overuse of emergency rooms, or abandoned attempts to obtain care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Preventive Medicine
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2026.108585
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expectations and realities in primary care appointment access in the United States: A national study

Sarah Tinkler, Brigham Walker, Edel Doherty, Ethan Tsai et al.
Preventive Medicine
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Expectations and realities in primary care appointment access in the United States: A national study

Sarah Tinkler, Brigham Walker, Edel Doherty, Ethan Tsai, Rajiv Sharma, Alexandra Shimanovsky
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While patients expect timely appointments, little is known about how accurately patient expectations reflect the realities of access to a primary care physician. METHODS: We deployed a national survey (N = 6119, conducted in 2021) to measure patient expectations and a separate national field experiment (N = 11,016, conducted between 2013 and 2016) where trained research assistants called physician offices seeking an appointment to measure physician availability. RESULTS: Using multivariate regression analyses, we find that patients expected to call 1.9 physicians to secure an appointment, consistent with an appointment offer rate of 49%. However, expectations of 5.4 days wait to an appointment were below the 28.5 wait days offered. Male respondents expected to wait 1.9 days longer and were offered appointments 2.0 days later. However, despite not expecting fewer appointments, Black and Hispanic patients were 2 percentage points and 3 percentage points less likely to be offered appointments, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents on average were able to accurately characterize overall primary care appointment access, but were unable to accurately describe how long one has to wait until being seen by a physician. Discrepancies between expectations and access in primary care may lead to low patient satisfaction, overuse of emergency rooms, or abandoned attempts to obtain care.

Preventive MedicineVol. 208
Tulane University (US), Portland State University (US), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Portland State University, Tulane University
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.