Researching migration decision-making: Tools for policy content analysis, interviews, social network mapping, video diary collection, and focus group discussions

As part of the AspirE project’s commitment to transparency, methodological rigor, and knowledge sharing, a set of key data collection tools developed for our fieldwork is now available. These include instruments for conducting interviews with migrants and experts, social network mapping protocols, and guidelines for focus group discussions. All tools have been developed through a collaborative process, involving extensive internal discussions and consultations across the consortium. Importantly, they have undergone rigorous review by institutional Data Protection Officers (DPOs), particularly at the coordinating institution, to ensure full compliance with data protection standards and ethical requirements. In addition, partners have implemented context-specific adaptations to reflect local legal frameworks, cultural sensitivities, and research conditions. Prior to the start of fieldwork, these instruments were formally submitted to the relevant ethical review boards and committees across participating institutions. Ethics approvals were obtained in line with national and institutional regulations, ensuring that all data collection activities adhere to the highest standards of research integrity, participant protection, and confidentiality. By making these materials available, AspirE aim to support further research, encourage methodological reflection, and facilitate responsible data collection practices in migration studies and beyond

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19355185
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Researching migration decision-making: Tools for policy content analysis, interviews, social network mapping, video diary collection, and focus group discussions

Asuncion Fresnoza‐Flot
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Researching migration decision-making: Tools for policy content analysis, interviews, social network mapping, video diary collection, and focus group discussions

Asuncion Fresnoza‐Flot
article en

Abstract

As part of the AspirE project’s commitment to transparency, methodological rigor, and knowledge sharing, a set of key data collection tools developed for our fieldwork is now available. These include instruments for conducting interviews with migrants and experts, social network mapping protocols, and guidelines for focus group discussions. All tools have been developed through a collaborative process, involving extensive internal discussions and consultations across the consortium. Importantly, they have undergone rigorous review by institutional Data Protection Officers (DPOs), particularly at the coordinating institution, to ensure full compliance with data protection standards and ethical requirements. In addition, partners have implemented context-specific adaptations to reflect local legal frameworks, cultural sensitivities, and research conditions. Prior to the start of fieldwork, these instruments were formally submitted to the relevant ethical review boards and committees across participating institutions. Ethics approvals were obtained in line with national and institutional regulations, ensuring that all data collection activities adhere to the highest standards of research integrity, participant protection, and confidentiality. By making these materials available, AspirE aim to support further research, encourage methodological reflection, and facilitate responsible data collection practices in migration studies and beyond

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.