P15: What Existed Before Matter and the Spaticle Field : The Origin of Space, Time, and the Physical Substrate of Reality in an Infinite Universe

Modern cosmology and fundamental physics describe spacetime with extraordinary mathematical success, yet the physical origin of the spacetime fabric itself remains largely unaddressed. General relativity treats spacetime as a real structure that curves, stretches, and supports propagating gravitational waves, while quantum gravity programs repeatedly search for a deeper microstructure beneath the classical geometric description. However, the standard cosmological narrative typically begins with the Big Bang and simply states that space and time came into being, without a physically coherent account of how an extended geometric substrate capable of curvature, temporal modulation, and wave propagation could arise from literal nothingness. This paper argues that the failure lies not in the mathematical formalisms of general relativity, but in the inherited finite-origin assumptions of standard cosmology and in the historical privileging of a beginning-model that aligned more readily with longstanding creation-compatible worldview priors. The paper reopens foundational questions left unresolved by the standard model, including what exactly expanded, what stretches when spacetime expands, how time became embedded into the fabric of space, and why spacetime is treated as physically real enough to wave and curve yet denied a fully specified substrate ontology. Within the broader Big Flare-Up Theory (BFUT), the paper develops a continuity-based ontological ladder: space must exist; truly infinite space cannot emerge from literal non-space; therefore absolute nothingness was never the state of reality; prior reality must always have existed in some real condition; any real condition is necessarily an energy state; and from that prior condition the Spaticle field manifests as the physically real spacetime substrate from which later matter, cosmic structure, biological life, and conscious complexity emerge in lawful continuity. The paper further argues that the thermodynamic arrow of time, the low-entropy condition, conservation laws, causality, and the existence of structured physical laws all strongly favor continuity over creation-from-nothing. The result is a continuity-based ontology that closes a foundational gap in modern cosmology and extends the ontological base of the BFUT research programme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19811691
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

P15: What Existed Before Matter and the Spaticle Field : The Origin of Space, Time, and the Physical Substrate of Reality in an Infinite Universe

V. K. Sharma
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
preprint

P15: What Existed Before Matter and the Spaticle Field : The Origin of Space, Time, and the Physical Substrate of Reality in an Infinite Universe

V. K. Sharma
preprint en

Abstract

Modern cosmology and fundamental physics describe spacetime with extraordinary mathematical success, yet the physical origin of the spacetime fabric itself remains largely unaddressed. General relativity treats spacetime as a real structure that curves, stretches, and supports propagating gravitational waves, while quantum gravity programs repeatedly search for a deeper microstructure beneath the classical geometric description. However, the standard cosmological narrative typically begins with the Big Bang and simply states that space and time came into being, without a physically coherent account of how an extended geometric substrate capable of curvature, temporal modulation, and wave propagation could arise from literal nothingness. This paper argues that the failure lies not in the mathematical formalisms of general relativity, but in the inherited finite-origin assumptions of standard cosmology and in the historical privileging of a beginning-model that aligned more readily with longstanding creation-compatible worldview priors. The paper reopens foundational questions left unresolved by the standard model, including what exactly expanded, what stretches when spacetime expands, how time became embedded into the fabric of space, and why spacetime is treated as physically real enough to wave and curve yet denied a fully specified substrate ontology. Within the broader Big Flare-Up Theory (BFUT), the paper develops a continuity-based ontological ladder: space must exist; truly infinite space cannot emerge from literal non-space; therefore absolute nothingness was never the state of reality; prior reality must always have existed in some real condition; any real condition is necessarily an energy state; and from that prior condition the Spaticle field manifests as the physically real spacetime substrate from which later matter, cosmic structure, biological life, and conscious complexity emerge in lawful continuity. The paper further argues that the thermodynamic arrow of time, the low-entropy condition, conservation laws, causality, and the existence of structured physical laws all strongly favor continuity over creation-from-nothing. The result is a continuity-based ontology that closes a foundational gap in modern cosmology and extends the ontological base of the BFUT research programme.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University (IN)
Life in Land
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.