Understanding Barriers to Cancer Pain Management: Insights From Patients and Healthcare Professionals—A Systematic Review

Background: Cancer-related pain is a prevalent and debilitating symptom that significantly impairs patients' quality of life, leading to physical discomfort as well as emotional and psychological distress. Despite the availability of effective pain control strategies, cancer pain remains inadequately managed worldwide. This challenge is multifactorial, involving barriers related to patients, healthcare providers, healthcare systems, and deficiencies in coordinated multidisciplinary care. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251027582). A comprehensive search of SCOPUS, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies examining barriers to cancer pain management from patient and healthcare professional perspectives were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and findings were synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 244 records were identified, with 23 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after screening and eligibility assessment. Overall methodological quality was good, although most studies were cross-sectional. Four major categories of barriers were identified: patient-related, healthcare provider-related, healthcare system-related, and multidisciplinary care-related barriers. Patient-related barriers were most frequently reported fear of opioid addiction, concerns about side effects, under-reporting of pain, fatalistic beliefs, and cultural or religious influences. Provider-related barriers involved inadequate training, poor pain assessment practices, opioid-related concerns, and limited inter-professional communication. System-level barriers included restrictive opioid regulations, limited access to analgesics, staffing shortages, and lack of standardized protocols. Multidisciplinary barriers reflected poor care coordination, insufficient patient education, and lack of individualized pain management plans. Conclusion: Cancer pain management is hindered by interconnected barriers across patient, provider, and system levels. Addressing these challenges requires improved clinical practices, targeted professional education, balanced opioid policies, and strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Health Challenges
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.70247
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Opioid Use
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Barriers to Cancer Pain Management: Insights From Patients and Healthcare Professionals—A Systematic Review

Efrem Fenta, Misganew Terefe Molla, Tikuneh Yetneberk, Belete Muluadam Admassie et al.
Public Health Challenges
Pain Management and Opioid Use
article

Understanding Barriers to Cancer Pain Management: Insights From Patients and Healthcare Professionals—A Systematic Review

Efrem Fenta, Misganew Terefe Molla, Tikuneh Yetneberk, Belete Muluadam Admassie, Amare Belete Getahun, Biruk Adie Admass, Basazinew Chekol, Diriba Teshome, Amanuel Sisay Endeshaw, Abebe Tiruneh Boled, Kumlachew Geta Belete, Getachew Mekete Diress
article en

Abstract

Background: Cancer-related pain is a prevalent and debilitating symptom that significantly impairs patients' quality of life, leading to physical discomfort as well as emotional and psychological distress. Despite the availability of effective pain control strategies, cancer pain remains inadequately managed worldwide. This challenge is multifactorial, involving barriers related to patients, healthcare providers, healthcare systems, and deficiencies in coordinated multidisciplinary care. Methods: This systematic review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251027582). A comprehensive search of SCOPUS, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published between 2015 and 2025. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies examining barriers to cancer pain management from patient and healthcare professional perspectives were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and findings were synthesized narratively. Results: A total of 244 records were identified, with 23 studies meeting the inclusion criteria after screening and eligibility assessment. Overall methodological quality was good, although most studies were cross-sectional. Four major categories of barriers were identified: patient-related, healthcare provider-related, healthcare system-related, and multidisciplinary care-related barriers. Patient-related barriers were most frequently reported fear of opioid addiction, concerns about side effects, under-reporting of pain, fatalistic beliefs, and cultural or religious influences. Provider-related barriers involved inadequate training, poor pain assessment practices, opioid-related concerns, and limited inter-professional communication. System-level barriers included restrictive opioid regulations, limited access to analgesics, staffing shortages, and lack of standardized protocols. Multidisciplinary barriers reflected poor care coordination, insufficient patient education, and lack of individualized pain management plans. Conclusion: Cancer pain management is hindered by interconnected barriers across patient, provider, and system levels. Addressing these challenges requires improved clinical practices, targeted professional education, balanced opioid policies, and strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.

Public Health ChallengesVol. 5(2)
Bahir Dar University (ET), University of Gondar (ET), Debre Markos University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pain Management and Opioid Use
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.