Juvenile predation overwhelms nutritional effects on female ungulate fat reserves in a high‐predation system

Abstract Ungulate body fat reserves reflect the nutritional environment, often serving as a useful indicator of bottom‐up resource availability. However, body fat reserves also integrate energetic costs associated with avoiding predation risk and reproductive effort, and it is unknown how bottom‐up and top‐down factors integrate to affect body fat reserves. We used generalized mixed‐effects models to evaluate how bottom‐up, top‐down and intrinsic factors explained variation in winter ingesta‐free body fat (IFBF) of female elk ( Cervus canadensis ) near Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada from 2015 to 2021. We found two top models were competitive, with calf survival during the first 3–4 months of life and female age included in both models. There was more support for bottom‐up forage effects than indirect predation risk effects. Based on model predictions, females with a calf surviving through the previous summer had 3.6 percentage points (95% CI: 2.4%, 4.9%) lower IFBF the subsequent winter than females without a surviving calf. Because calf survival during the first 3–4 months of life is largely driven by predation in this system, we suggest top‐down effects of predation through calf mortality influenced body fat around nine times more than bottom‐up factors in our study. Under high predation, variation in body fat levels of female ungulates across a population may not reflect only bottom‐up influences on body condition, but also differences in predation. Thus, both bottom‐up and top‐down factors must be considered when assessing the nutritional environment. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functional Ecology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.70343
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Juvenile predation overwhelms nutritional effects on female ungulate fat reserves in a high‐predation system

Sara H. Williams, Hans Martin, Jodi Berg, Evelyn H. Merrill et al.
Functional Ecology
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Juvenile predation overwhelms nutritional effects on female ungulate fat reserves in a high‐predation system

Sara H. Williams, Hans Martin, Jodi Berg, Evelyn H. Merrill, Nicole P. Bealer, Mark Hebblewhite
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ungulate body fat reserves reflect the nutritional environment, often serving as a useful indicator of bottom‐up resource availability. However, body fat reserves also integrate energetic costs associated with avoiding predation risk and reproductive effort, and it is unknown how bottom‐up and top‐down factors integrate to affect body fat reserves. We used generalized mixed‐effects models to evaluate how bottom‐up, top‐down and intrinsic factors explained variation in winter ingesta‐free body fat (IFBF) of female elk ( Cervus canadensis ) near Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada from 2015 to 2021. We found two top models were competitive, with calf survival during the first 3–4 months of life and female age included in both models. There was more support for bottom‐up forage effects than indirect predation risk effects. Based on model predictions, females with a calf surviving through the previous summer had 3.6 percentage points (95% CI: 2.4%, 4.9%) lower IFBF the subsequent winter than females without a surviving calf. Because calf survival during the first 3–4 months of life is largely driven by predation in this system, we suggest top‐down effects of predation through calf mortality influenced body fat around nine times more than bottom‐up factors in our study. Under high predation, variation in body fat levels of female ungulates across a population may not reflect only bottom‐up influences on body condition, but also differences in predation. Thus, both bottom‐up and top‐down factors must be considered when assessing the nutritional environment. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Functional Ecology
University of Alberta (CA), University of Montana (US)
Safari Club International, National Science Foundation, Alberta Conservation Association, University of Montana, Shikar Safari Club International Foundation, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Parks Canada, University of Alberta, Montana Institute on Ecosystems, Alberta Fish and Wildlife, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.