Cumulative and Co-Occurring Strains Among Mass Public Shooting Perpetrators: Implications for Violence Prevention

Background.Mass public shootings represent a significant source of fatal and nonfatal injury in the United States.This study examines patterns of strain among individuals who carried out these events, with attention to the prevalence, co-occurrence, and cumulative burden of stressors. Methods.Data were drawn from a database of mass public shootings in the United States from 1999 to 2024, comprising 171 incidents and 175 perpetrators.Information was collected using a structured, multisource approach including official records, secondary reports, and triangulated media sources.Eighteen dichotomous indicators of strain were coded.Descriptive statistics assessed prevalence and cumulative strain, and phi coefficients examined pairwise associations. Results.Perpetrators experienced multiple, overlapping forms of strain (mean = 4.78; SD = 2.78).Psychiatric concerns, job-related difficulties, and interpersonal stressors were most common.Strains frequently cooccurred, with strong associations among interpersonal and psychological factors and between structural stressors and ideological motivations.Most perpetrators experienced multiple concurrent stressors, indicating that these events rarely are preceded by a single, isolated grievance. Conclusions.Mass public shootings are better understood as the result of cumulative and co-occurring strains rather than isolated risk factors.Injury and violence prevention efforts may be strengthened by emphasizing patterns of stressors, early identification, and coordinated, systems-level responses, including threat assessment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CrimRxiv
Published
2026-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.c4554fa4
Primary Topic
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cumulative and Co-Occurring Strains Among Mass Public Shooting Perpetrators: Implications for Violence Prevention

Jaclyn Schildkraut, M. Hunter Martaindale, Emily A. Greene-Colozzi
CrimRxiv
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
article

Cumulative and Co-Occurring Strains Among Mass Public Shooting Perpetrators: Implications for Violence Prevention

Jaclyn Schildkraut, M. Hunter Martaindale, Emily A. Greene-Colozzi
article en

Abstract

Background.Mass public shootings represent a significant source of fatal and nonfatal injury in the United States.This study examines patterns of strain among individuals who carried out these events, with attention to the prevalence, co-occurrence, and cumulative burden of stressors. Methods.Data were drawn from a database of mass public shootings in the United States from 1999 to 2024, comprising 171 incidents and 175 perpetrators.Information was collected using a structured, multisource approach including official records, secondary reports, and triangulated media sources.Eighteen dichotomous indicators of strain were coded.Descriptive statistics assessed prevalence and cumulative strain, and phi coefficients examined pairwise associations. Results.Perpetrators experienced multiple, overlapping forms of strain (mean = 4.78; SD = 2.78).Psychiatric concerns, job-related difficulties, and interpersonal stressors were most common.Strains frequently cooccurred, with strong associations among interpersonal and psychological factors and between structural stressors and ideological motivations.Most perpetrators experienced multiple concurrent stressors, indicating that these events rarely are preceded by a single, isolated grievance. Conclusions.Mass public shootings are better understood as the result of cumulative and co-occurring strains rather than isolated risk factors.Injury and violence prevention efforts may be strengthened by emphasizing patterns of stressors, early identification, and coordinated, systems-level responses, including threat assessment.

CrimRxiv
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gun Ownership and Violence Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.