Origins of Li <sub>2</sub> S‐Rich Layer Formation at Li <sub>6</sub> PS <sub>5</sub> Cl|Li Interface: Insights from First‐Principles Simulations

All‐solid‐state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) using sulfide electrolytes such as Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSC) offer high ionic conductivity and high safety, yet their performance remains limited by reductive instability at the Li‐metal interface. Here, density functional theory (DFT) calculations combined with ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations are used to investigate, with atomistic resolution, the reduction pathways, charge–transfer processes, and structural rearrangements at the thermodynamically preferred LPSC(111)|Li(100) interface. The simulations reveal a strongly localized interfacial reduction process in which PS 4 tetrahedra undergo rapid, layer‐dependent decomposition at the Li‐contacting surface, proceeding through sequential PS bond cleavage to form PS 3 , PS 2 , PS, intermediates, followed by formation of isolated P and S species. Coordination number and radial distribution function (RDF) analyses show that Li 2 S forms primarily from sulfur (S) initially coordinated in Li 6 S units, whereas S released from PS 4 units stabilizes mainly as partially reduced Li x S intermediates. Bader charge analysis further demonstrates that electron transfer is confined within the top Li‐metal layers and the bottom region of the LPSC slab, driving PS bond cleavage and restructuring of the local sulfide environments. Collectively, these results provide an atomistic‐level mechanistic understanding of Li 2 S‐rich interphase formation at LPSC|Li interfaces, offering quantitative guidance for designing electronically blocking interlayers that can mitigate thiophosphate reduction in next‐generation ASSLBs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries & Supercaps
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202600008
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Origins of Li 2 S‐Rich Layer Formation at Li 6 PS 5 Cl|Li Interface: Insights from First‐Principles Simulations

Jyh‐Chiang Jiang, Ryo Maezono, Santhanamoorthi Nachimuthu, Yun‐Fang Luo et al.
Batteries & Supercaps
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Origins of Li 2 S‐Rich Layer Formation at Li 6 PS 5 Cl|Li Interface: Insights from First‐Principles Simulations

Jyh‐Chiang Jiang, Ryo Maezono, Santhanamoorthi Nachimuthu, Yun‐Fang Luo, Bing Joe Hwang, Hao‐Wen Chang
article en

Abstract

All‐solid‐state lithium batteries (ASSLBs) using sulfide electrolytes such as Li 6 PS 5 Cl (LPSC) offer high ionic conductivity and high safety, yet their performance remains limited by reductive instability at the Li‐metal interface. Here, density functional theory (DFT) calculations combined with ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations are used to investigate, with atomistic resolution, the reduction pathways, charge–transfer processes, and structural rearrangements at the thermodynamically preferred LPSC(111)|Li(100) interface. The simulations reveal a strongly localized interfacial reduction process in which PS 4 tetrahedra undergo rapid, layer‐dependent decomposition at the Li‐contacting surface, proceeding through sequential PS bond cleavage to form PS 3 , PS 2 , PS, intermediates, followed by formation of isolated P and S species. Coordination number and radial distribution function (RDF) analyses show that Li 2 S forms primarily from sulfur (S) initially coordinated in Li 6 S units, whereas S released from PS 4 units stabilizes mainly as partially reduced Li x S intermediates. Bader charge analysis further demonstrates that electron transfer is confined within the top Li‐metal layers and the bottom region of the LPSC slab, driving PS bond cleavage and restructuring of the local sulfide environments. Collectively, these results provide an atomistic‐level mechanistic understanding of Li 2 S‐rich interphase formation at LPSC|Li interfaces, offering quantitative guidance for designing electronically blocking interlayers that can mitigate thiophosphate reduction in next‐generation ASSLBs.

Batteries & SupercapsVol. 9(5)
Tokyo University of Information Sciences (JP), National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW), Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (JP), National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (TW), National Center for Theoretical Sciences (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.