Teachers' Ratings of Multilingual Learners' Science Skills: Seeing Skills Beyond Standardized Test Performance
ABSTRACT Though prior research has explored test score differences in science performance between multilingual learners (MLs) and non‐MLs, most assessments of multilingual learners' (MLs) science learning consist not of standardized test scores but of routine formative and summative assessments provided by teachers who work with them day‐to‐day. However, teachers' assessments of ML students' science skills may be uniquely different from other students. This study leveraged nationally representative data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten Class of 2011 (ECLS‐K:2011) to document teacher ratings of science skills for MLs compared to non‐MLs as well as the relationship between teacher ratings and ML status after accounting for standardized science achievement. The findings demonstrate that elementary school teachers rate MLs somewhat lower in science skills than non‐MLs in unadjusted models in the earliest grades of elementary school. After accounting for standardized test performance, however, teachers in the lowest grades rate ML students' science skills higher on average than non‐MLs conditional on test scores. The analysis explores variation across ML subgroups and informs policy and practice.
Authors
- F. Chris Curran (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5680-1446)
- Lelydeyvis Boza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5233-1307)
- Amber Deig (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4181-0707)
- Mark B. Pacheco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9706-2704)
- Tiffany S. Tan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5317-5651)
- Katharine Taylor Harris‐Walls
Institutions
- Augusta University (US)
- University of Florida (US)
- Palo Alto Institute (US)
- Learning Policy Institute (US)
- University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Science Education
- Published
- 2026-04-27
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70075
- Primary Topic
- Multilingual Education and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation