Multicenter evaluation of three-shot SAM2 segmentation for group-level quantification of lumbar paraspinal muscles at the L4/L5 level on multi-sequence MRI

PURPOSE: To evaluate a data-efficient segmentation approach for quantifying lumbar paraspinal muscle (LPM) at the single-slice L4/L5 level across multi-sequence MRI, minimizing annotation burden while achieving reliable group-level quantification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 943 MRI scans from 486 participants were retrospectively analyzed, with a single axial slice at the L4/L5 disc level selected from each scan. The images included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and Dixon MRI. A training-free Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) was applied for dataset-level LPM segmentation. For each dataset, one, two, or three ground-truth masks were used as prompt labels (4, 8, and 12 images in total across all four datasets), with the remaining images used for testing (939, 935, and 931 images, respectively). Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Automated quantifications were assessed using two one-sided tests (TOST), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: With three-shot prompting, SAM2 achieved the highest segmentation accuracy for the left and right lumbar erector spinae and multifidus muscles (DSC: 0.871 ± 0.128 to 0.944 ± 0.063). Automated measurements were statistically equivalent to manual references within a 5% margin for bilateral muscle area and a 10% margin for bilateral fat ratio, except for the fat ratio of left erector spinae, which required a 14.14% margin. ICCs ranged from 0.822 to 0.856 for muscle area and 0.771-0.927 for fat ratio. CONCLUSION: L4/L5 slice-level LPM segmentation and quantification are achieved using only three labeled examples per dataset, with multicenter evaluation and publicly available code and data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112886
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicenter evaluation of three-shot SAM2 segmentation for group-level quantification of lumbar paraspinal muscles at the L4/L5 level on multi-sequence MRI

Gervase Tuxworth, Zhongyi Zhang, Julie Hides, Enrico De Martino
European Journal of Radiology
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Multicenter evaluation of three-shot SAM2 segmentation for group-level quantification of lumbar paraspinal muscles at the L4/L5 level on multi-sequence MRI

Gervase Tuxworth, Zhongyi Zhang, Julie Hides, Enrico De Martino
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a data-efficient segmentation approach for quantifying lumbar paraspinal muscle (LPM) at the single-slice L4/L5 level across multi-sequence MRI, minimizing annotation burden while achieving reliable group-level quantification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 943 MRI scans from 486 participants were retrospectively analyzed, with a single axial slice at the L4/L5 disc level selected from each scan. The images included T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and Dixon MRI. A training-free Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) was applied for dataset-level LPM segmentation. For each dataset, one, two, or three ground-truth masks were used as prompt labels (4, 8, and 12 images in total across all four datasets), with the remaining images used for testing (939, 935, and 931 images, respectively). Segmentation accuracy was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Automated quantifications were assessed using two one-sided tests (TOST), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: With three-shot prompting, SAM2 achieved the highest segmentation accuracy for the left and right lumbar erector spinae and multifidus muscles (DSC: 0.871 ± 0.128 to 0.944 ± 0.063). Automated measurements were statistically equivalent to manual references within a 5% margin for bilateral muscle area and a 10% margin for bilateral fat ratio, except for the fat ratio of left erector spinae, which required a 14.14% margin. ICCs ranged from 0.822 to 0.856 for muscle area and 0.771-0.927 for fat ratio. CONCLUSION: L4/L5 slice-level LPM segmentation and quantification are achieved using only three labeled examples per dataset, with multicenter evaluation and publicly available code and data.

European Journal of RadiologyVol. 201
Griffith University (AU), Aalborg University (DK)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, European Space Agency, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.