The Moral Standing of Created Agents: Bad Is More Owned Than Good
= 2,499), we investigated whether created agents are more likely to be seen as owned if they cause harm. This prediction was suggested by the hypothesis that ownership is sometimes used to express moral responsibility, though it runs against the tendency for harm to introduce restrictions on ownership. In all experiments, participants more often judged that created agents belonged to their inventors when they caused harm than when they did good. The final experiment then showed that these judgments do not strongly align with assessments of rights over created agents. Overall, the findings suggest that harmfulness changes the moral standing of created agents in a novel way, increasing perceptions of them as property.
Authors
- Ori Friedman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2346-9787)
- Emily E. Stonehouse
Institutions
- University of Waterloo (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Published
- 2026-04-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672261439251
- Primary Topic
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada